Periodic Reporting for period 3 - vCare (Virtual Coaching Activities for Rehabilitation in Elderly)
Période du rapport: 2021-04-01 au 2022-08-31
As a general conclusion after conducting the final patient tests, the vCare system represents a safe and efficient solution for ensuring continuity of medical rehabilitation care and access to personalized cognitive and motor treatments for patients with neurological and cardiological disease. The use of the vCare system was associated with the improvement of the clinical conditions and an increase in Quality of Life.
In a second step, the Living Labs simulated the homes by research apartments providing a protected environment and support for the patients successfully trying out the VC solution. The Virtual Coaching solution was implemented into a controlled environment at the premises of each medical partner. Three Living Labs have been implemented for the pathologies of Stroke, Parkinson`s Disease, and Heart Failure. In addition to the Living Lab prototype, users are continuously involved in the design process. Results from the patients indicated good ratings of the vCare solution and, in general, a high level of enthusiasm and curiosity both by the patients and the professional users.
Thirdly, within the subsequent Pilot Phase the patients used the solution in their real home setting. Admittedly, the achieved final results vary a bit depending on the pathology and sub-score of the indicator assessment. But in sum, the main objective can be regarded as reached in terms of the measured improvements in QoL during the pilot phase by ensuring continuity of care and the access to personalized cognitive (for the neurological cases), motor exercises (for all patient groups) and overall coaching advises by the Virtual Coach. Also, the overall provision of an effectively working and well-acceptable smart virtual coaching could have been proved by the final user tests.
Orthogonally to the technical and clinical tests, altogether the foreseen dissemination plan has been successfully addressed: both the clinical (rehabilitation@home) and technological (vCoach related technology) aspects have been continuously followed trying to find the right communication angle and opportunities for each of the two. The focus was mainly to put on raising awareness on the potential benefits of the virtual coach in the rehabilitation clinical context and the strategy proposed by the consortium to reach solid results, i.e. Technology Readiness Level (TRL 7) by the end of the project. All the communication channels foreseen at the beginning of the project were created and maintained and some complementary initiatives were developed: this included the vCare Newsletter, the production of both animated and life videos and the activation of complementary social networks. All vCare consortium partners have been involved in the dissemination activities. Both direct and indirect exploitation routes have been drafted and prepared to be materialised post project.
The vCare solution is deluged with several sensors to evaluate patient’s health status, care plan adherence, and other factors that are necessary for smooth recovery of quality of life. It also provides an interface for caregivers to extract patients’ relevant information and to tune the treatment.
Further, vCare integrates semantic technologies (reasoning, behavioural models, predictive analytics, going beyond only rule-based but more intelligent adaptations), well-elaborated coaching services and clinical pathway services having the virtual coach as the central and controlling element. The Virtual Coach encapsulates coaching and supportive services as well as tele-monitoring services. The latter provide the data-related basis for the virtual coach’s decision logic as well as tracing data the service provision is based on. However, the innovativeness of vCare does not only reside in the utilization of single technologies but in the combination of these technologies. This is to individualise/personalise the home care/rehabilitation and somehow fill the gap the caregiver’s absence in the home environment has caused.