Objective
What determines the patterns of international trade and the associated welfare effects? Can individual
incentives to trade diverge from societal objectives? Should governments intervene to promote or restrict
international transactions? Questions like these have recently gained new salience, in Europe and elsewhere,
due to renewed protectionist pressures and resurgent nationalistic tendencies arising from diffuse
disenchantment with globalization.
The aim of the research project is to highlighting key dimensions along which the answers to these questions
obtained from conventional trade models with homogenous firms should be revisited in the light of
permanent pervasive firm heterogeneity. In particular, the project will pursue four specific objectives through
four integrated work packages providing new insights on how firm heterogeneity affects: (1) the ability of
markets to deliver allocative efficiency; (2) The design of optimal multilateral trade policies; (3) The
comparative advantages of countries; (4) The capabilities of a country as an exporter.
The first work package will investigate whether the allocative inefficiency (“misallocation”) determined by
firm heterogeneity in the presence of pricing distortions is quantitatively relevant for a country’s aggregate
economic performance, and whether economic integration reduces or exacerbates such misallocation. The
second work package will develop the theoretical implications of firm heterogeneity for trade policy, with
special emphasis on the cooperative design of optimal multilateral trade agreements aimed at maximizing the
joint welfare of all trade partners. The third work package will study how country, sector and firm
characteristics interact to determine countries’ responses to trade liberalization. The fourth work package
will investigate the distinct role of firm heterogeneity in determining a country’s ability to export through the
shape of the productivity distribution of its producers.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences economics and business economics production economics productivity
- social sciences other social sciences development studies development theories global development studies globalization
- social sciences economics and business business and management commerce
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
H2020-EU.1.1. - EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
ERC-ADG - Advanced Grant
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2017-ADG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
20136 Milano
Italy
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.