Project description
Automated analysis of allergic reactions
Nearly 1 in 4 people suffer from allergies, reactions of the immune system to substances such as pollen, pet dander or food. Identification of the allergen is central for avoiding allergic reactions. The conventional screening method is the prick test, which involves puncturing the skin with suspected allergy-causing substances and observing for signs of an allergic reaction. The EU-funded INNOPRICK project has developed a skin scanner to aid the interpretation of the skin prick test. The device scans the forearm after application of the different allergens and using specialised software quantifies the allergic reactions. This makes the prick test more accurate and less prone to human error.
Objective
Allergic diseases are considered to be the epidemic of the 21st century in developed countries. Currently, near 25% of the population suffers some form of allergic reaction, either food, skin or respiratory. The diagnosis of these reactions is crucial for prescribing the patient the right treatment.
To determine if a person is allergic or not, today’s most widespread method is the Prick Test. It consists in the deposit of a series of drops of the allergens to be tested on the patient’s forearm and then pierce it, getting the allergen to enter the system. After several minutes, the patient will show a reaction, and this reaction will be used to quantify the sensitivity of the patient, the way to size each reaction is done manually by the specialist. However, it offers a very poor precision and the process is very slow.
INNOPRICK has developed a new ICT solution to make the Prick Test more accurate (40%), faster (90%) and at a lower cost (-90%), thus helping the medical staff make a more rigorous diagnosis. It consists of a laser device capable of scanning the forearm after implementing the different allergens into the skin and the appearance of the papules. After the scan, the device transfers the results to a software that identifies and quantifies the allergic reactions. Finally, it allows to save the results into the hospital’s database.
The Innoprick system allows the professionals to obtain quantitative values of a reaction that serve as a reference in the different allergy studies regardless of the hospital centre where it has been done in order to give a better diagnosis to the patient.
All the developments and advances have been done hand by hand with a group of doctors from the University Hospital of Navarra, led by Dr. Gabriel Gastaminza (allergist) who initially contacted the University of Navarra to find a solution for the detected inaccuracies of the Prick Test.
The invention was patented in 2014 with publication nº: EP2967331A1.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- engineering and technology electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering electronic engineering sensors optical sensors
- natural sciences computer and information sciences data science big data
- social sciences economics and business business and management business models
- medical and health sciences clinical medicine allergology
- natural sciences physical sciences optics laser physics
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
H2020-EU.2.3. - INDUSTRIAL LEADERSHIP - Innovation In SMEs
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme -
H2020-EU.3. - PRIORITY 'Societal challenges
See all projects funded under this programme -
H2020-EU.2.1. - INDUSTRIAL LEADERSHIP - Leadership in enabling and industrial technologies
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
SME-1 - SME instrument phase 1
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) H2020-EIC-SMEInst-2018-2020
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
20000 SAN SEBASTIAN
Spain
The organization defined itself as SME (small and medium-sized enterprise) at the time the Grant Agreement was signed.
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.