Skip to main content
European Commission logo print header

Isolation and Evolution in Oceanic Islands: the human colonisation of the Canary Islands

Periodic Reporting for period 2 - IsoCAN (Isolation and Evolution in Oceanic Islands: the human colonisation of the Canary Islands)

Período documentado: 2021-07-01 hasta 2022-12-31

The Canary Islands were settled 2,000 years ago by farming populations from North Africa representing the westernmost limits of Eurasian human colonisation until European contact with the Americas. This is a superlative example of colonisation because the first colonists remained isolated until the arrival and colonization of Europeans in the 15th century AD. When Europeans arrived, Canarian populations spoke distinct dialects and did not have the seafaring skills needed to navigate between islands.
The colonisation of the Canary Islands is an example of adaptation and sustainability because people were able to create anthropogenic landscapes capable of supporting increasing human populations on diverse and isolated island ecologies with a low density of food resources. Nevertheless, how first colonisers transformed pristine islands into domestic landscapes to make islands more habitable for humans remains unresolved.
IsoCAN project explores the first colonisation of the Canary Islands from the beginning of the Common Era to the 15th century AD, which represents the last expansion of the Mediterranean farming package. This project intends to (1) establish the chronology of the initial colonisation of the Canary Islands; (2) determine the geographic origins and the genetic variability of the human population, domesticates (animals and plants) and parasitic species (insects); (3) define the process of adaptation and resilience of the first settlers; and (4) investigate human impact on landscape and the management of natural resources. IsoCAN will enable us to investigate two transcendental questions: how do humans colonise new territories, and what are the cultural and biological adaptations? This ambitious project will provide insights about the adaptive mechanisms through which isolated and fragile insular ecosystems were successfully colonised by human societies, focusing on social complexity, subsistence practices and landscape transformation.
The IsoCAN project is applying a multi-disciplinary approach including radiocarbon dating, paleogenomic, bioarchaeology and paleoecological analyses. What it is more significant, this is the first time all of these research lines have been considered for a single project, integrating different kinds of research to address the first human colonisation of the Canary Islands. Most of the research tasks have developed as expected providing new evidence on the different topics of the project. Fieldwork and lab work have been carried out from the outset of the project. Preliminary results have been presented in local and international conferences. Three articles are already published in high-ranked international journals. Ground-breaking results are currently being considered in peer-reviewed journals. More contributions are expected to be submitted for publication in the following months. IsoCAN has also disseminated its results to the general public through several activities such as conferences, press releases, media interviews, and social media inputs.
The IsoCAN project advances the largest dataset of radiocarbon datings linked to the early settling of the Canary Islands, as well as their critical evaluation through a chronometric hygiene protocol yielding rigorous Bayesian models. The findings of IsoCAN suggest that that (i) the Romans most likely discovered the islands around the 1st century AD and occupied the Islet of Lobos until the first half of the 2nd century AD; (ii) the Berbers from western North Africa set foot on Lanzarote somewhere between the 1st and 3rd centuries AD; (iii) the Romans and Berbers potentially cohabited the easternmost region of the archipelago; and (iv) the Berbers rapidly spread throughout the different islands over a period of 250 years resulting in what is identified as a Pan-Canarian cultural horizon.
The paleogenomic evidence gathered by IsoCAN confirms that the indigenous population of the Canary Islands have a North-African ancestry. The findings also suggest lack of gene flow between islands and constant or decreasing effective population sizes, suggesting that populations were isolated. While some island populations maintained relatively high genetic diversity, with the only detected bottleneck coinciding with the colonization time, other islands with fewer natural resources show the effects of insularity and isolation. Finally, consistent genetic differentiation between eastern and western islands points to a more complex colonization process than previously thought. Phylogenetic analysis of the goat mitochondrial DNA sequences indicates they belong to the A and A2a haplogroups, which are frequent in the Mediterranean Basin, coinciding with the results obtained from human populations. The paleogenomic evidence on plants has determined the millenium-long continual use of the same barley germplasm at some places in the Canary Islands.
The IsoCAN project has contributed to better understand how first settlers of the Canary Islands adapted their farming activities to the different natural conditions of each island. This project has reviewed the archaeobotanical evidence recorded in pre-Hispanic/Amazigh sites of the Canary Islands. Information obtained indicate the presence of a comparable crop ‘package’ on all the islands since at least the 3rd-5th centuries CE. This set of plants was likely introduced from north-western Africa, and consists of hulled barley, durum wheat, lentil, broad bean, pea, and fig. The crop ‘package’ was probably introduced at a single episode during the initial colonization, whereafter no more plants were added. After the initial settling and until the arrival of the European seafarers, the archipelago remained isolated. Over time, this led to a decline in crop diversity in all islands apart from Gran Canaria.
Finally, the analysis of the island palaeodietary profiles on humans allowed us to detect differences at inter-island and intra-island levels. The analyses of oral health conditions, stable isotope and dental microwear on humans present a complex portrait with significant variations. These differences were likely result of variations on subsistence practices and/or local adaptations to specific environments such as coastal areas. The findings suggest that each island culture developed a specific evolutionary path as result of different ecological constraints, diversity of crops, and social decisions.

Documentos relacionados