During the first 3 years of the project, various alternatives to antibiotics (i.e. gut microbiota modulators, veterinary medicinal products, immunostimulants and dietary interventions) were developed and optimized with regard to formulation, administration route, dosage, etc. and their efficacy for control of post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD) was studied under controlled experimental conditions using pig infection models. Two interventions were selected for the farm trials in WP5 based on the clinical efficacy and safety data generated in the pre-clinical studies in WP1-4, as well as legal and economic considerations and acceptance by pig farmers, veterinarians and consumers: i) a faecal filtrate transplantation (FFT) protocol developed at the University of Copenhagen in WP1 and ii) a high-fiber diet developed by Schothorst Feed Research in WP4. The FFT protocol, which utilizes faeces from healthy sows from the same farm to avoid the risk of spreading pathogens across farms, showed a significant reduction in the prevalence of PWD and mortality. The dietary intervention, which is based on the administration of fermentable fiber to sows in the transition diet and inert fiber to suckling piglets, showed a slight effect in improving fecal consistency and reducing the prevalence of PWD. However, neither intervention had an effect comparable to antibiotic treatment, meaning they can be usefully used to reduce antibiotic use but not eliminate it. The legal procedures to request authorization for testing these two interventions on pig farms in Denmark, France and the Netherlands were initiated as part of the activities in WP7.
An extensive survey was conducted to understand how alternatives to antibiotics are perceived by consumers, pig veterinarians and farmers in 5 countries (Germany, Poland, France, Spain and Denmark). The survey shows that traditional solutions to prevent antibiotic use, such as vaccines and biosecurity measures, are more favorably accepted than innovative solutions such as FFT and phage therapy. Interestingly, approximately 70% consumers state that they would pay 10% or more to buy food products from animals that are not treated with antibiotics. The outcomes of the survey were submitted as a public deliverable (D8.5) and disseminated through the project website (
https://avant-project.eu) the AVANT social media as well as lectures, animation videos and infographics presented in international conferences and events involving key stakeholders.