Periodic Reporting for period 1 - CIRCautophAGING (INTER-REGULATION OF CIRCADIAN AND AUTOPHAGIC PROCESSES IN STEM CELLS: IMPACT ON TISSUE REGENERATION AND AGING)
Période du rapport: 2021-01-04 au 2023-01-03
Circadian rhythms are influenced and can be trained by external cues like light or habits such as exercise and diet. In virtually all the cells of the body, between 10-30% of genes follows an oscillating pattern of transcription/translation throughout the 24 h. The transcription factors responsible for this are known, and the generation of transgenic models based on their modulation represented a turning point in this field. At the molecular level, the transcription factor BMAL1 (brain and muscle ARNT-like 1) is considered the master regulator of circadian genes. Overall, this regulation depends on complex feedback loops controlled by other transcription factors and their regulators. Briefly, when BMAL1 is activated it dimerizes with CLOCK (circadian locomotor output cycles kaput) and binds to E-box elements to activate the transcription of controlled clock genes (CCGs). Period and (Per) cryptochrome (Cry) are among the CCGs regulated by the BMAL1/CLOCK complex, their encoded proteins also dimerize and act as inhibitors of BMAL1/CLOCK transcriptional activity. PER and CRY are eventually degraded by the proteasome, which releases the repression of BMAL1/CLOCK. Additionally, there are auxiliary loops that involve nuclear receptor subfamily 1 group D member 1 (Nr1d1 or REV-ERB-α) and member 2 (Nr1d2 or REV-ERBβ), which inhibit BMAL1 transcription. On the other hand, the retinoic acid receptor (RAR)-related orphan receptor (ROR) activates BMAL1 transcription.
The light-synchronized central clock has classically been thought to be dominant over clocks in peripheral tissues, however, recent reports have highlighted a role for local peripheral clocks themselves in governing their own rhythmic programs. It is increasingly established that oscillations are the result of integrated signals that comes from external cues as well as inter- intra-organ communication signals. How this regulation impinges on stem cells is unknown as in part due to technical challenges associated with working with these cells, as well as the previous lack of suitable animal models. To address this, we dissected the contribution of the local intrinsic clock 1) in a system where only MuSCs lack the clock regulator Bmal1, and 2) in a system in which the clock is reconstituted in MuScs in an otherwise Bmal1-null context. Overall, this ambitious project aimed to elucidate: (i) the impact of circadian rhythms on MuSCs by investigating the contribution of the cell-intrinsic (local) clock to their homeostasis, (ii) the crosstalk between the central and local clocks by specifically restoring the clocks in these two types of cell/tissue in an otherwise arrhythmic model (iii) the contribution of autophagy in MuSCs circadian regulation.
No website has been developed for the project.