Skip to main content
Go to the home page of the European Commission (opens in new window)
English English
CORDIS - EU research results
CORDIS
Content archived on 2024-05-21

Explanatory Models and Public Understanding: The Debate between Science and Religion 1800-1918

Objective

The authority of scientists in society has increased to the point where their views dominate decision- making both public and private. The period under consideration, in effect the long nineteenth century, saw the essential steps taken towards this state of affairs.
The increasing success of scientific explanation and invention was essential; but the struggle with the then dominant authority of the Church, and of religious philosophy, was the decisive factor in the change. In this process, scientists came to the fore not only as discoverers of new truths, but as founders and leaders of institutions, and as conscious public representatives and spokesmen for the scientific worldview.
The present Conference project proposes to examine the emergence of the figure of the scientific leader as it emerged in the course of the nineteenth century, from anonymous and low-status toiler to acknowledged leader of a high-profile community. Often this process included the career change from scientific work to the development of new associations, institutions, and of new genres of communication - the pubic lecture, the public debate, the travel description in which scientific results were leavened by personal narrative and illustration, the popular-scientific essay, the general reflections on nature and society - that met the needs of a better educated general public being prepared for political responsibility. The leader took on a variety of functions formerly carried out by other authority figures.
It is envisaged to submit a proposal for a second Conference at a later stage. It would be closely related to this empirically oriented study, in that it would look at the cogency and adequacy, as well as the persuasive strategies, of the structures of argument employed by these figures in the debate between philosophical world-views.
ftp://ftp.cordis.lu/pub/improving/docs/HPCF-2000-00229-1.pdf(opens in new window)

Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)

CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.

You need to log in or register to use this function

Topic(s)

Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.

Call for proposal

Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.

Data not available

Funding Scheme

Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.

ACM - Preparatory, accompanying and support measures

Coordinator

Type of Event: Euro Conference
EU contribution
No data
Address
This event takes place in Exeter

United Kingdom

See on map

Total cost

The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.

No data
My booklet 0 0