A typology was established based on the observed qualitative characteristics of a wide range of mudflats, as well as examples from the literature (Dyer, 1998). This was tested by application to an intertidal bank in the Scheldt Estuary, and gave reasonable results when an energy dissipation term was included.
For a more quantitative and less subjective classification, a database of mudflat characteristics was established. A total of 18 mudflats were quantified in terms of twenty different variables describing physical characteristics, sediment properties and biological attributes. The results were analysed by correlation analysis, multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis to find a classification scheme describing similarities between them. Five levels of separation were found. Tidal range separated mudflats into hypertidal (>6m range), meso/macrotidal (2-6m) and microtidal (<2m). This was followed by an exposure index, separating mudflats with high and low exposure. Mudflat slope separated low slope mudflats (<0.04), high slopes (>0.04) and very steep slopes (-0. 16). For the largest group of meso/macrotidal mudflats, dry density separated mudflats with low density (<600kg/m3) from intermediate density (600-1000kg/m3) and high density (>.1000kg/m3). The biological characteristics were also examined by analysis of the occurrence of species in three mudflat zones. There were strong relationships for the upper zone, but no significant relationships for the other zones.
The published classification, together with the typology, will provide a framework for the description of other mudflats. It will allow comparison and generalization, which will benefit prediction, since similar processes can be assumed active in the different types. The classification provides a means of establishing the relative importances of different process.