Objective
The specific objective of the proposal is to improve the procedures of auto-evaluation and the knowledge of his impact on the performances of Universities in different European countries, and to develop a pluralistic and decentralized assessement of education establishments, teachers and administrative staff.
The key questions to answer are:
1) under what conditions the evaluation reenforces the performance of Universities?
2) what is the most performing form of evaluation?
3) are the universities and under what conditions important actor in construction of labour market for qualified work, in particular at regional level?
In order to fill its three objectives, EVALUE considers that case studies are the best methods. Five fields of evaluation will be covered:
1) external evaluation;
2) evaluation of education establishments;
3) individual and collective evaluation of teachers and of the administrative staff;
4) evaluation of the relationship between education, employment and economic development;
5) evaluation of effectiveness (diversity, history and of performance indicators).
In order to understand the dynamics of the evaluation process, and for each of the five fields, EVALUE will study: the decision to evaluate, the patterns of reference, the aims of the evaluation (diversity and hierarchy), the actors and the logic of action, the organizational conditions, the devices and tools, the stages and the cost of evaluation, the results of the evaluation and their diffusion, the impacts of evaluation.
The evaluation processes is compared in 8 countries in order to cover the Eropean Union from North to South. Periodic reporting. Final report presented and discussed with representatives of the European Rector Conference.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences educational sciences didactics
- humanities history and archaeology history
- social sciences economics and business business and management employment
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Data not available
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Coordinator
92001 Nanterre
France
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.