Project description
Elucidating the nature of decision-making
Limited cognitive abilities can compromise decision-making and reduce individual autonomy. This issue is compounded by the diversity of decision-making theories, creating complex implications for medical and legal practices, impacting the treatment and rights of individuals in these contexts. Unfortunately, these issues often receive inadequate attention in philosophy and practice. With the support of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programme, the CAD project seeks to assess philosophical theories of decision-making. It will consider insights from psychology, cognitive science and psychiatry to shed light on decision-making processes. This endeavour aims to enhance our understanding of decision-making and facilitate its evaluation within legal and medical frameworks, taking into account external factors and scientific research.
Objective
The focus of this project is what it is for an agent to be able to make a decision, and when we should count them as being able to do so. This is a question that has received sustained attention throughout the history of philosophy, and there are many different theories and models of decision-making on offer. Different views of decision-making can have huge practical impact: in various legal and medical contexts, decision-making capacity is assessed in order to determine how people are viewed and treated, including whether they are fit to stand trial, have the right to refuse medical treatment, or are viewed as criminally responsible.
Drawing on a range of philosophical, psychological, cognitive scientific, and psychiatric literature, this project will aim to evaluate different philosophical theories of decision-making. The novel contribution of this project, and its particular methodological focus, will be to focus on assessing theories of decision-making by their practical impact - an important, but often-neglected metric for assessing philosophical theories and concepts.
As well as further elucidating and clarifying the core question of the nature of decision-making, two key benefits of this project are envisaged. First, a substantive contribution to the question of how decision-making ought to be assessed in the relevant legal and medical contexts. For example, one key focus of the project will be the neglect of external influences (social and environmental) in facilitating decision-making, where currently in many contexts they are treated solely as potential hinderances. Secondly, the project will bring recent work in philosophy of science on 'pluralism' to bear on the question of how legal frameworks and decisions are and ought to be informed by relevant scientific and empirical research and expertise, given their different focuses, goals, and explanatory interests and the impact that this has on their conceptualizations of relevant phenomena.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- humanities philosophy, ethics and religion philosophy history of philosophy
- humanities history and archaeology history
You need to log in or register to use this function
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.2 - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-EF - HORIZON TMA MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships - European Fellowships
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) HORIZON-MSCA-2022-PF-01
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
8000 Aarhus C
Denmark
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.