WP A1: A new processing pipeline for connectivity-based parcellation of the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC) has been developed. In the human connectome project data set participants with unequivocal gyrification patterns (two groups: with/without prominent paracingulate sulcus) were identified and individual seed regions for tractography were determined. Preliminary results converge on a rather stable number of nine connectivity-based clusters (regions), which show remarkably similar patterns within each configuration group. Analyses are ongoing and are planned to result in a manuscript towards the end of 2025.
WP A2: The technical set up for the dense-sampling approach was established including the use of individualized head cases to minimize head movement and optimize signal-to-noise ratio of the fMRI data. Based on these pilot experiments, a dense sampling was performed and finished for a first participant (15 recording sessions). Based on the results, adjustments of the dense-sampling protocol have been made. Based on the individual anatomical configuration five more participants were recruited for continuation of WP A2. Individual head cases aiming to minimize head movement in the scanners are currently being produced. Technical issues with eye tracking in the MRI scanner were solved. Recordings will start in spring 2025.
WP B1/2: In a first TUS study, participants underwent TUS for 120 s in the target region (pMFC), an active control region (posterior cingulate cortex), or sham stimulation in three separate sessions in counterbalanced order. TUS targeting is done with neuronavigation based on individual head models and the individual results of a preceding fMRI session localizing error-related brain activity. Within 15 min after sonication, the ultrasound gel was removed and an EEG cap with 16 electrodes was applied. Participants performed a speeded flanker task while EEG was recorded. Statistical analysis showed that task performance was better after sonication of the pMFC compared to the sham and control sessions. Surprisingly, no TUS effect on EEG correlates of performance monitoring (ERN, Pe) or response conflict (N2) were found. Analyses of preresponse changes in the EEG dynamics are ongoing. A manuscript is in preparation. One reason for the relatively small effect of TUS may be that relatively little stimulation energy was used, compared with studies in non-human primates. An updated modeling procedure with optimized individual head models has been implemented, which will allow to model the stimulation focus and the acoustic/mechanic and thermic effects better. This will enable us to modify the stimulation protocol in the follow-up study and to increase the energy conveyed to the target area while keeping all parameters well within the safety limits. In the follow-up study five TUS sessions within the same participants are planned. Three target areas are based on prior knowledge about the performance monitoring network. As active control regions serve frontal white matter and lateral ventricle. Preceding MRI sessions are ongoing (T1, PETRA, fMRI). The actual TUS sessions are planned to be started in April 2025.