Skip to main content
European Commission logo
English English
CORDIS - EU research results
CORDIS
CORDIS Web 30th anniversary CORDIS Web 30th anniversary

Healthy or harmful distrust? On the democratic relevance of political scepticism over blind (dis)trust

Project description

A healthy dose of scepticism is good for democracy

Trust and scepticism. Democracy cannot work without both. Blind trust and blind distrust would be detrimental. However, studies of political trust focus almost exclusively on the level of trust. The ERC-funded CRITICALTRUST project will develop a two-dimensional model of political (dis)trust and create new measures that distinguish blind from evaluative (dis)trust. The project will carry out a cross-national panel survey in eight European countries (Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden and the United Kingdom). The findings will shed light on issues related to low and declining levels of political trust and offer advice on how to change this.

Objective

Paradoxically, representative democracy requires not only citizens’ trust in the institutions of democracy, but also a healthy dose of political scepticism towards these institutions. Scholars have warned against the detrimental effects of blind trust and blind distrust. The former would make citizens susceptible to manipulation, the latter to alienation. By contrast, (dis)trust that is not blind but evaluative stimulates vigilant civic engagement. While blind (dis)trust would lead to an anomic democracy, evaluative (dis)trust would stimulate democratic reinvigoration and accountability.
We should therefore not merely distinguish between political trust and distrust, but also between dispositional/blind and evaluative (dis)trust.
However, empirical studies of political trust focus almost exclusively on the level of trust. The standard political trust survey items cannot distinguish blind (dis)trust from evaluative (dis)trust. This vast lacuna at the heart of political trust research left the major questions in the field unanswered: on the trends, causes, and consequences of political trust.

CRITICALTRUST addresses this fundamental problem. It first develops a novel, two-dimensional model of political (dis)trust, and creates new measures that distinguish blind from evaluative (dis)trust. This model and these measures will be the foundation for primary data collection (large-N survey + experiments). The survey is designed as a three-wave, cross-national panel survey in 8 European countries: Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Both the survey’s panel element and the experiments allow us to systematically test causal effects that have long been proposed in the literature.

CRITICALTRUST thereby answers questions that plagued political trust research for decades. It will offer diagnoses of the risks of low and declining trust, and advice to democratic actors whether and how to stimulate political trust.

Host institution

UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM
Net EU contribution
€ 1 999 995,00
Address
SPUI 21
1012WX Amsterdam
Netherlands

See on map

Region
West-Nederland Noord-Holland Groot-Amsterdam
Activity type
Higher or Secondary Education Establishments
Links
Total cost
€ 1 999 995,00

Beneficiaries (1)