Project description
A close look at Russian Empire and USSR minority rights
Political and cultural elites invoked ‘legality’ and ‘justice’ in the Russian Empire and the Soviet Union. Existing literature studied these notions in the context of state policy and intellectual opposition. However, there is little knowledge of how instrumental they were in terms of minorities. While there are apparent differences between the two periods, there are also substantial similarities. The EU-funded JUSTIMINO project will explore how minorities, from the Russian Empire’s ‘Great Reforms’ of the 1860s to the dissolution of the USSR in 1991, routinely invoked and employed ‘legality’ and ‘justice’ to safeguard their rights. The project hypothesises that the systems allowed them to participate in the political and cultural elites.
Objective
The Russian Empire and the Soviet Union are rarely associated with the rule of law. And yet, the notions of legality and justice greatly mattered in both: political and cultural elites invoked them as much as the wider citizenries. While existing literature has addressed legality and justice in studies of state policy and intellectual opposition to the two orders, there is little recognition of how instrumental they both were to ethnic and religious minorities. Whereas religion was one of the key determinants of rights, privileges, and obligations in the empire, nationality, understood in ethnic terms, replaced religious affiliation in this capacity under socialism. Being part of a minority could mean open or subtle forms of discrimination. Yet, such discrimination was neither automatic nor did it go unchallenged. This project therefore explores the ways in which minorities, from the Russian Empires Great Reforms of the 1860s to the dissolution of the USSR in 1991, routinely invoked and employed legality and justice to enforce their rights. It argues that the systems allowed, even encouraged, them to do so. What is more, minorities were also represented among the political and cultural elites, from imperial lawyers to Soviet party officials. What did minority actors expect when they called on justice and legality? More importantly, how and to which degree did this strategy help them defend their rights in two highly authoritarian states? While there are obvious differences between the imperial and Soviet periods in this regard, there are also substantial similarities. To track these, the project proposes an ambitious multi-sited enquiry, combining an analysis of published sources with extensive work in regional and central archives, and oral history. This ground-breaking research will also create an online database on minority legal action that will be debated with NGOs and wider society in a variety of innovative knowledge transfer formats.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences political sciences political policies civil society civil society organisations nongovernmental organizations
- social sciences sociology social issues social inequalities
- humanities philosophy, ethics and religion religions
- social sciences law
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2021-COG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
10117 Berlin
Germany
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.