Skip to main content
Go to the home page of the European Commission (opens in new window)
English English
CORDIS - EU research results
CORDIS

INspiring and ANchoring TrUst in Science

CORDIS provides links to public deliverables and publications of HORIZON projects.

Links to deliverables and publications from FP7 projects, as well as links to some specific result types such as dataset and software, are dynamically retrieved from OpenAIRE .

Deliverables

Policy Recommendations to help ensure trustworthy research funding (opens in new window)

Building on the outcomes from all tasks in WP6 D6 provides tailor-made recommendations for policy and governance aiming to increase the trustworthiness of science. The deliverable will contain a suite of four policy briefs addressing RPOs, RFOs, HEIs and STI decision makers respectively.

Digital handout with best practices and recommendations for aligning research efforts with societal needs and concerns (opens in new window)

This deliverable results from the integrated outcomes of all the tasks in WP5.Digital handout with best practices and recommendations for aligning research efforts with societal needs and concerns. It will be based on desk research (conceptual analysis, literature survey and policy document analysis) and outreach to relevant institutions and policy makers to determine the notion of open science for the context of the project, translating its findings into a best practice document that will also inform the IANUS consortium’s activities.

Lessons learned from case studies and co-creation (opens in new window)

This deliverable integrates the knowledge generated by all tasks under WP4.A report desccribing the findings from WP4 and specifically the lessons learned lessons derived from real world examples of how to gain, maintain and prevent loss of public confidence and trust in STI.

Conceptual, methodological and ethical framework (opens in new window)

This deliverable results from the integration of all tasks under WP3.It entails a report stating:- the conceptualframework for analysing trust and distrust in science, research and innovation, building on the philosophical and social sciences literature on trust. Does trust depend on trustworthiness of the trusted party: what is the role of other influences on the trustor? How to distinguish warranted from unwarranted trust, and healthy from unfounded distrust? What does warranted trust involve?, methodological and ethical framework resulting from the activities in WP3.- a methodological and ethical framework. How can trust in science (in individual scientists, in institutions, in science as a system, in scientific outcomes) be strengthened? What are the mechanisms to build trust these different areas? Which relevant policies, regulations, governance mechanisms need to be considered and how to support required changes? How to cope with irrational distrust? How to achieve well-placed trust?

Final Communication, Exploitation & Dissemination Plan (opens in new window)

Building on the plan developed in D7.1 the Communication & Dissemination plan will account for the findings in the project and create a strategy for how these will be communicated beyond the end of the project. Exploitation will be particularly important at this stage.

First Communication, Exploitation & Dissemination Plan (opens in new window)

A first draft of the Communication Dissemination Training Plan CDP provides initial information concerning our CD ethos and approach During the first 3 months of the project this draft CDP will be revised and expanded to propose an accurate matchmaking among target groups channels and content The plan will include IANUS visual identity and common layout for the CD materials events foreseen timetable and responsibility and monitoring system to evaluate communication activities results and impact During the project the CDP will be updated The plan will also include the approach foreseen to maximize exploitation The exploitation aspect will be particularly relevant for D72

Policy brief Reporting Period 1 (opens in new window)

Policy Recommendations using a format provided by the REA At this point in the project there will not yet be enough input to provide policy recommendations that are evidence based This early report will therefore instead problematize and raise awareness for challenging issues which is later built upon at the policy brief due on M36 D62

Comprehensive analysis of the research and policy landscape (opens in new window)

This deliverable results from integrating the findings from all tasks under WP2.In dialogue with the other partners the WP lead will incorporate the insights provided by the previous tasks into a comprehensive report which identifies strengths and gaps to address and defines input for the work in WP3, WP4, WP5, to strengthen the evidence and added value of the IANUS approachThe resulting deliverable will be a comprehensive analysis of the research and policy landscape (providing critical input for subsequent WPs concerning existing challenges and constraints and the added value of the IANUS approach)

Publications

Mobilizing COVID-19 level public health interventions for climate breakdown is necessary (opens in new window)

Author(s): Yogi Hale Hendlin; Ruben Visser
Published in: The Journal of Climate Change and Health, Issue 8, 2022, ISSN 2667-2782
Publisher: Elsevier
DOI: 10.1016/J.JOCLIM.2022.100152

Journal of Science Communication (opens in new window)

Author(s): Dana Mahr, Arianna Bussoletti, Christopher Coenen, Francesca Comunello, Julija Baniukevič, Nora Weinberger
Published in: JCOM Journal of science communication, Issue 24, 2025, ISSN 1824-2049
Publisher: SISSA Media Lab srl
DOI: 10.22323/149220250818111637

Researchers’ Practice and Perception of Research Ethics and the Role of Institutional Support: Insights From a pan-European Researcher Survey (opens in new window)

Author(s): Hendrik Berghaeuser, Max Prass, Ralf Lindner
Published in: Journal of Academic Ethics, Issue 23, 2025, ISSN 1570-1727
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
DOI: 10.1007/S10805-024-09590-Z

Understanding methodological innovation in participatory research: insights from participatory EU-funded projects (opens in new window)

Author(s): Ana Barbosa Mendes, Charlotte Bruns, Dana Mahr, Simone Driessen
Published in: Journal of Science Communication, Issue 23, 2024, ISSN 1824-2049
Publisher: Sissa Medialab Srl
DOI: 10.22323/2.23060803

Science, Activism, and Climate Action: Navigating Credibility, Responsibility, and Engagement (opens in new window)

Author(s): Amalia Kallergi; Laurens Landeweerd
Published in: Journal of Academic Ethics, 2025, ISSN 1572-8544
Publisher: Springer Nature
DOI: 10.1007/S10805-025-09626-Y

Ties of Trust: a bowtie model to uncover trustor-trustee relationships in LLMs (opens in new window)

Author(s): Eva Paraschou; Maria Michali; Sofia Yfantidou; Stelios Karamanidis; Stefanos Rafail Kalogeros; Athena Vakali
Published in: Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2025
DOI: 10.48550/ARXIV.2506.09632

Searching for OpenAIRE data...

There was an error trying to search data from OpenAIRE

No results available

My booklet 0 0