CORDIS proporciona enlaces a los documentos públicos y las publicaciones de los proyectos de los programas marco HORIZONTE.
Los enlaces a los documentos y las publicaciones de los proyectos del Séptimo Programa Marco, así como los enlaces a algunos tipos de resultados específicos, como conjuntos de datos y «software», se obtienen dinámicamente de OpenAIRE .
Resultado final
Building on the outcomes from all tasks in WP6 D6 provides tailor-made recommendations for policy and governance aiming to increase the trustworthiness of science. The deliverable will contain a suite of four policy briefs addressing RPOs, RFOs, HEIs and STI decision makers respectively.
Digital handout with best practices and recommendations for aligning research efforts with societal needs and concerns (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)This deliverable results from the integrated outcomes of all the tasks in WP5.Digital handout with best practices and recommendations for aligning research efforts with societal needs and concerns. It will be based on desk research (conceptual analysis, literature survey and policy document analysis) and outreach to relevant institutions and policy makers to determine the notion of open science for the context of the project, translating its findings into a best practice document that will also inform the IANUS consortium’s activities.
Lessons learned from case studies and co-creation (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)This deliverable integrates the knowledge generated by all tasks under WP4.A report desccribing the findings from WP4 and specifically the lessons learned lessons derived from real world examples of how to gain, maintain and prevent loss of public confidence and trust in STI.
Conceptual, methodological and ethical framework (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)This deliverable results from the integration of all tasks under WP3.It entails a report stating:- the conceptualframework for analysing trust and distrust in science, research and innovation, building on the philosophical and social sciences literature on trust. Does trust depend on trustworthiness of the trusted party: what is the role of other influences on the trustor? How to distinguish warranted from unwarranted trust, and healthy from unfounded distrust? What does warranted trust involve?, methodological and ethical framework resulting from the activities in WP3.- a methodological and ethical framework. How can trust in science (in individual scientists, in institutions, in science as a system, in scientific outcomes) be strengthened? What are the mechanisms to build trust these different areas? Which relevant policies, regulations, governance mechanisms need to be considered and how to support required changes? How to cope with irrational distrust? How to achieve well-placed trust?
Final Communication, Exploitation & Dissemination Plan (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)Building on the plan developed in D7.1 the Communication & Dissemination plan will account for the findings in the project and create a strategy for how these will be communicated beyond the end of the project. Exploitation will be particularly important at this stage.
First Communication, Exploitation & Dissemination Plan (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)A first draft of the Communication Dissemination Training Plan CDP provides initial information concerning our CD ethos and approach During the first 3 months of the project this draft CDP will be revised and expanded to propose an accurate matchmaking among target groups channels and content The plan will include IANUS visual identity and common layout for the CD materials events foreseen timetable and responsibility and monitoring system to evaluate communication activities results and impact During the project the CDP will be updated The plan will also include the approach foreseen to maximize exploitation The exploitation aspect will be particularly relevant for D72
Policy brief Reporting Period 1 (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)Policy Recommendations using a format provided by the REA At this point in the project there will not yet be enough input to provide policy recommendations that are evidence based This early report will therefore instead problematize and raise awareness for challenging issues which is later built upon at the policy brief due on M36 D62
Comprehensive analysis of the research and policy landscape (se abrirá en una nueva ventana)This deliverable results from integrating the findings from all tasks under WP2.In dialogue with the other partners the WP lead will incorporate the insights provided by the previous tasks into a comprehensive report which identifies strengths and gaps to address and defines input for the work in WP3, WP4, WP5, to strengthen the evidence and added value of the IANUS approachThe resulting deliverable will be a comprehensive analysis of the research and policy landscape (providing critical input for subsequent WPs concerning existing challenges and constraints and the added value of the IANUS approach)
Publicaciones
Autores:
Yogi Hale Hendlin; Ruben Visser
Publicado en:
The Journal of Climate Change and Health, Edición 8, 2022, ISSN 2667-2782
Editor:
Elsevier
DOI:
10.1016/J.JOCLIM.2022.100152
Autores:
Dana Mahr, Arianna Bussoletti, Christopher Coenen, Francesca Comunello, Julija Baniukevič, Nora Weinberger
Publicado en:
JCOM Journal of science communication, Edición 24, 2025, ISSN 1824-2049
Editor:
SISSA Media Lab srl
DOI:
10.22323/149220250818111637
Autores:
Hendrik Berghaeuser, Max Prass, Ralf Lindner
Publicado en:
Journal of Academic Ethics, Edición 23, 2025, ISSN 1570-1727
Editor:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
DOI:
10.1007/S10805-024-09590-Z
Autores:
Ana Barbosa Mendes, Charlotte Bruns, Dana Mahr, Simone Driessen
Publicado en:
Journal of Science Communication, Edición 23, 2024, ISSN 1824-2049
Editor:
Sissa Medialab Srl
DOI:
10.22323/2.23060803
Autores:
Amalia Kallergi; Laurens Landeweerd
Publicado en:
Journal of Academic Ethics, 2025, ISSN 1572-8544
Editor:
Springer Nature
DOI:
10.1007/S10805-025-09626-Y
Autores:
Eva Paraschou; Maria Michali; Sofia Yfantidou; Stelios Karamanidis; Stefanos Rafail Kalogeros; Athena Vakali
Publicado en:
Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2025
DOI:
10.48550/ARXIV.2506.09632
Buscando datos de OpenAIRE...
Se ha producido un error en la búsqueda de datos de OpenAIRE
No hay resultados disponibles