Project description
Investigating economic, scientific, and sustainability models of early mining
In the past, mining generally followed a pattern: ores were discovered and extracted, the mining community thrived, and then the mine closed down. However, in Central Europe from about 1550 to 1850, state-employed administrators strategically prolonged mining activities over decades. Reflecting on why and how they did so opens the possibility of advancing debates in economic and environmental history, and history of science and technology. Funded by the European Research Council, the SCARCE project seeks to introduce the history of resource management as a unique field of study, using archival mining records from Central Europe as a case study. The project will put forward new theories on the history of economic development, on innovation in technology and science, as well as on the provenance of resource sustainability.
Objective
Early modern mining often played out as a drama in three acts: I. Ores are Discovered, II. Communities Flourish, III. The Mines Collapse. Across Central Europe, however, this drama took an unusual turn: emerging territorial states stepped in to reorganise the sector and suspended the collapse of mining for years, decades, and centuries.
Understanding why and how state-employed administrators prolonged the lifespan of mines has great potential to advance debates in economic history, history of science and technology, and environmental history. The principal aim of this project is to open up the history of resource management as a field of study whose questions and results are equally well integrated in these three fields. It will use Central European mining as a high-stakes case to prove the viability of such a history. By doing so, it will provide
(1) a new account of capitalist development by showing how an industry in seemingly underdeveloped Central Europe shaped two important building blocks of modern economies: the rationalisation of labour, and the accumulation of capital.
(2) a new understanding of technoscientific innovation in proto-industrial settings by showing how administrative procedures (accounting, reporting) shaped scientists/technicians understanding of natural processes.
(3) a new genealogy for modern sustainability by focusing attention on the contradictions that shaped the extraction of non-renewable resources.
To achieve these aims, four researchers (1 PI, 1 Postdoc, 2 PhD) will analyse thousands of administrative reports from across Central Europe, using a new method, history of bureaucratic knowledge, based on recent advances in the history of science. They will work on four processes through which administrators made mining a long-term enterprise: (a) rationalising labour, (b) managing health and pollution, (c) sustaining investment, and (d) long-term planning.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
This project's classification has been validated by the project's team.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
This project's classification has been validated by the project's team.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2022-STG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
1010 WIEN
Austria
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.