Project description
Biomechanical computational models support spinal surgery decision making
Cancer metastases to bone reach the spine in 30-70 % of cases, resulting in fracture in about a third of cases. Decisions on whether to operate are based solely on radiographic images. Current scoring systems do not yield a definitive decision in more than half of cases making the decision highly subjective. The EU-funded METASTRA project aims to integrate AI and local biomechanics into biomechanical computational models to stratify patients with high fracture risk due to spine metastasis and identify the best personalised surgical treatment. The team’s highly trained and validated models will be combined in a decision support system that meets future regulatory requirements and tested in a multicentric prospective observational study.
Objective
Cancer patients (2.7M in Europe) with a positive prognosis are exposed to a high incidence of secondary tumours (≈1M). Bone metastases spread to the spine in 30-70% cases, reducing the load bearing capacity of the vertebrae and triggering fracture in 30% cases. Clinicians have only two options: either operate to stabilise the spine, or leave the patient exposed to a high fracture risk. The decision is highly subjective and can either lead to unnecessary surgery, or a fracture significantly affecting the quality of life and cancer treatment.
The standard-of-care to classify patients with vertebral metastasis are scoring systems based on radiographic images, with little consideration of the local biomechanics. Current scoring systems are unable to establish an indication for surgery in around 60% of cases. Thus, there is an unmet need to accurately and timely quantify the risk of fracture to improve patient stratification and identify the best personalised treatment.
This interdisciplinary project will develop Artificial Intelligence (AI)- and Physiology-based (VPH) biomechanical computational models to stratify patients with spine metastasis who are at high risk of fracture and to identify the best personalised surgical treatment. After rigorous model training with clinical (2000 retrospective cases) and biomechanical (120 ex vivo specimens) data, the new approach will be tested in a multicentric prospective observational study (200 patients). The models will be combined in a decision support system (DSS) enabling clinicians to successfully stratify metastatic patients. The models and the DSS will be designed so as to be suitable for regulatory requirements and future exploitation.
METASTRA will propose new guidelines for the stratification and management of metastatic patients. METASTRA approach is expected to cut the uncertain diagnoses from the current 60% down to 20% of cases. This will reduce patient suffering, and allow cutting expenditure by 2.4B€/year.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- medical and health sciences clinical medicine surgery
- medical and health sciences clinical medicine oncology
- natural sciences biological sciences biophysics
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.2.1 - Health
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme -
HORIZON.2.1.5 - Tools, Technologies and Digital Solutions for Health and Care, including personalised medicine
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-RIA - HORIZON Research and Innovation Actions
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) HORIZON-HLTH-2022-TOOL-12-two-stage
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
40126 Bologna
Italy
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.