Project description
Empirical insights into the tangled web of decentralisation
In the Global South, decentralisation reforms have been fervently embraced as solutions to a myriad of issues, from poor public services to corruption. These reforms, most notably in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA), are touted for promoting citizen participation and accountability. However, the crucial question remains: are decentralisation reforms truly delivering on their promises? With the support of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programme, the LG-Conflict project seeks to unravel the complex dynamics of decentralisation. With a particular focus on Tunisia, this research effort aims to assess the extent to which these reforms genuinely redistribute decision-making power, scrutinising the conditions under which conflicts arise between central government appointees and locally elected officials.
Objective
Decentralization reforms in the Global South have witnessed a surge since the 1980s, embraced by governments and international donors as a solution to myriad problems from poor public services and territorial inequalities to corruption and low public trust. Decentralization reforms have been introduced across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA). Many of these reforms are strongly supported by international donors on the assumption that they promote citizen participation, accountability and local development. However, there is little empirical assessment of whether decentralization reforms are, in fact, achieving these purported benefits.
Following decentralization reforms in the MENA in the past decade, prominent conflicts have taken place between appointed and elected subnational officials. The researcher's own PhD research on the politics of decentralization reforms in Tunisia in 2011-19 suggests that decentralization reforms and the entry of thousands of elected local councillors into politics is challenging the existing distribution of power between elected local politicians and centrally-appointed regional or municipal officials. Conflicts between these two groups and their outcomes have significant implications for both the democratic and developmental benefits of decentralization. This research project seeks to identify to what extent decentralization reforms serve to redistribute decision-making power from central government to local elected representatives, and under what conditions. Specifically, it asks when and why appointed central government representatives and local elected officials come into conflict following decentralization, and under which conditions local elected officials are able to successfully resist bureaucratic opposition where conflict occurs, thus asserting local autonomy. These questions are central to reform processes that can deliver tangible improvements for the lives of millions.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- social sciences sociology governance public services
- social sciences sociology social issues corruption
- social sciences political sciences political policies civil society
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.2 - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-EF - HORIZON TMA MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships - European Fellowships
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) HORIZON-MSCA-2022-PF-01
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
405 30 Goeteborg
Sweden
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.