Project description
What drives transformations in the hierarchy of state criminality
In the complex landscape of global politics since World War II, an intriguing paradox has emerged: heightened sensitivity to state violence has led to a reduction in such acts, yet concurrently constructed an intricate economy of state criminality. This system prioritises certain offenses over others. This issue becomes even more pronounced when state security agents face trial for crimes committed in the line of duty. These trials compel society to grapple with the true cost of security and redefine the boundaries between acceptable and unacceptable state violence. With the support of the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programme, the SATHSCIF project will examine the tangled web of state criminality. It will uncover the interplay of political, social and moral factors.
Objective
Since WWII, global politics has developed a heightened sensitivity to state violence. Although this sensitivity contributed to a reduction in state violence, it also constructed an economy of state criminality that situates sex crimes as the worst atrocity while normalising other forms of violence. This logic is further exacerbated when state security agents (SSAs) stand trial for crimes committed during service. These trials require the public to come to terms with the cost of security and renegotiate the boundaries between legitimate and illegitimate state violence.
Studying SSAs trials as sites of contention over the states legitimate use of violence, I will explore: (1) What hierarchies are at work in shaping conceptions and reactions to state criminality? (2) What do these hierarchies teach us about social and political tolerance of state violence? and (3) Which political, social, and moral factors are at work in transforming hierarchies of state criminality?
Conducting qualitative research based on archival work, I will explore how legal-normative infrastructures facilitate hierarchies of state crime in Israel and France from WWII to the end of the 20th century. By studying SSAs trials in these sites, the project will develop a model to assess hierarchies of state criminality based on three categories of felonies: crimes against body and life and property and sex crimes.
I hypothesise that a different hierarchy is at play when SSAs commit such felonies compared to ordinary citizens. When SSAs are the perpetrators, I expect to find that property and sex crimes are judged more harshly than crimes against life and body that can be justified as a security necessity. If so, it is essential to design policies that break down these hierarchies, treating state criminality holistically. This research will therefore produce recommendations for human rights organisations to promote new methodologies and theoretical approaches to state criminality.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.2 - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-EF - HORIZON TMA MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships - European Fellowships
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) HORIZON-MSCA-2022-PF-01
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
50014 Fiesole
Italy
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.