Project description
Estimating the investibility of disruptive innovation
The number of listed firms in the US and Europe has dropped over the past 25 years. Due to investor-protection rules, this trend has made an increasing share of innovation inaccessible to most individuals, impacting how workers and savers can hedge against the risk of losing their jobs or savings. The ERC-funded Investibility project aims to study the economic consequences of the unequal sharing of the benefits of disruptive innovation. It will measure the investibility of disruptive innovation from 1841 to today and investigate how limited investibility affects the economy-wide cost of capital. Finally, it will explore whether limited access to high-expected-return investment opportunities in private markets can help explain the rise in wealth inequality.
Objective
"There are ever fewer listed firms in the U.S. and Europe, and listed firms produce an ever shrinking share of innovation. Over the past 25 years, the number of firms listed on a stock exchange has dropped by 41% in the U.S. and 55% in Europe. At the same time, listed firms account for a shrinking share of the highly disruptive inventions that have the most potential to boost productivity and growth. In the U.S. for example, listed firms account for only 8% of the most ground-breaking patents today, down from a peak of 34% in 1969. These two mega trends combine to make an ever increasing share of innovation “uninvestible” for most individuals who, owing to investor-protection rules, are barred from investing in unlisted firms. The objective of my project is to study the economic consequences of this increasing wedge in access to the financial rewards of breakthroughs in science and technology between “the few” and “the many.”
Disruptive innovation creates winners and losers. Workers and savers can, in principle, hedge against the risk of losing their jobs or savings due to ""creative destruction"" by investing in the winners. Whether everyone or only the few can hedge depends on the extent to which disruptive innovation is publicly investible. I will measure the investibility of disruptive innovation over the period 1841 to today, taking into account that a disruptive innovation that is born private can become publicly investible as its creator goes public, is acquired by a listed firm, or sells the patent to a listed firm. Armed with this measure of risk-spanning, I will investigate how the economy-wide cost of capital is affected when limited investibility results in an unequal sharing of the benefits of disruptive innovation between the wealthy and the many. Finally, I will test if differential access to high-expected-return investment opportunities as more and more economic activity takes place in private markets can help explain the rise in wealth inequality."
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2023-ADG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
SE11383 Stockholm
Sweden
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.