In WP1 (M1-M19), all partners led by CRF worked to define a list of KPIs for SSB cells according to the project’s call target and the requirements of the end-users. The tasks also included the definition of material and testing specifications for the cells to achieve the targeted requirements for the SSB being prepared in SOLVE. WP1 also focused on establishing an eco-safe and sustainable design framework for the development of SSB components and cells. In the final task, ACC identified all potential challenges for the recycling of SOLVE SSB cells and its components and defined several recycling concepts to be tested and validated in the project. In WP1, four out of the five tasks have been completed and closed. Within the reporting period, three deliverables (D1.1 D1.2 and D1.3) have been prepared in WP1.
In WP2 (M1-M27) which is led by PUL, the tasks were divided according to development of different components for the two types of SSB cells (Li-metal and anode-free) based on the specifications defined in WP1. For solid-state cathode development, IKTS worked on the development of CAM coating along with up-scaled production and CID worked on developing optimization of cathode formulation. In anode development, PUL along with TAU worked on optimizing and development of materials such as Li-metal and Li-alloy films for LiM SSB. OSS along with TAU and PUL worked on the development of lithiophilic current collectors for anode-free SSBs. Finally in electrolyte development, POLITO with the help of ARK, worked on the development of hybrid solid polymer electrolyte (HSPE) which would able compatible with both high-loading cathode and Li-metal/anode-free anode materials. Within the reporting period, one deliverable (D2.1) was prepared in WP2.
In WP3 (M7-M48) which is led by ARK, the tasks focused on the up-scaling of different cell components for the two types of SSB cells (Li-metal and anode-free) based on the material developments from in WP2. The main goal of this work-package is to supply scaled-up quantities of materials for cell development and assembly in WP4. CID worked on the development and upscaling of cathode formulations on pilot production line with slurry based wet processing. CEA on the other hand, focused on producing cathode via dry extrusion processing. PUL was focused on the upscale of LiM anodes with optimal configuration. In turn, ARK with support of POLITO worked on the upscale and manufacturing of the developed HSPE.
In WP4 (M13-M48) led by SAFT, the activity in this work package has been mainly focused on execution of Task 4.1 related to the development of LiM cells. CID and the rest of involved partners dedicated their efforts of the optimization of the cell assembly process and understanding limitations of the solid state batteries based on materials and components developed within WP2 and WP3.
In WP5 (M16-M48) which is led by CID, initial efforts were dedicated to the allocation of the cell prototypes testing matrix to specific tests in the framework of Task 5.1.
In WP6 (M1-M48) led by CEA, all efforts have been focused on an attempt to generate understanding in order to provide guidance for optimizing the overall project both solid state battery systems. This have been done though leveraging of the predeveloped SSB-PROTEO™ (CID) tool and modelling of (i) solid state cathode microstructure, (ii) lithiophilic current collector, and (iii) HSPE composition optimization. Within the reporting period, one deliverable (D6.1) was prepared in WP6.
In WP7 (M1-M48) which is led by TEN, the launch phase of the project and associated communication actions has been successfully completed. In addition, identification of the various projects and initiatives to be involved in has been successfully completed. Also, the exploitation and IPR strategy has been updated and detailed according to feedback of all consortium members. Within the reporting period, five deliverables (D7.1 D7.2 D7.3 D7.6 and D7.7) were prepared in WP7.
In WP8 (M1-M48) led by CID as project coordinator, all administrative, financial and technical management affairs have been properly addressed to assure correct execution of the project. Regular meetings (general assemblies, work package leader board meeting, teleconferences), communications channels (e-mail, Teams, Sharepoint etc.) and an effective information flow within the Consortium have been established by the coordinator (CID).