Project description
How Enlightenment science transcended national borders
In the long 18th century, scientific ideas didn’t just travel. They changed. The astronomical bestseller of the time, Bernard de Fontenelle’s Entretiens sur la pluralité des mondes (1686), was translated into Italian, German, and English, each time changing to consider the current debates and culture. Supported by the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programme, the PLURIFONT project will study how translators, who are frequently disregarded, were instrumental in influencing Enlightenment ideas. The project focuses on conventional narratives of scientific advancement by examining versions of Entretiens from 1686 to 1780. It demonstrates how translation functioned not only to transmit but also to debate and reframe natural philosophy across the linguistic and intellectual boundaries of Europe.
Objective
PLURIFONT focuses on the single greatest astronomical bestseller of the eighteenth century: Bernard de Fontenelle’s Entretiens sur la pluralité des mondes (1686), and its Italian, German and English translations as one interconnected case study, to be addressed from a transnational European perspective. I seek to appraise the several versions of the Entretiens over a timespan going from 1686 to circa 1780 as interventions in cross-linguistic and cross-cultural conversations on natural philosophy, while recovering the agency and voices of translators mostly unknown to present historiography. By addressing the wider topic of the production of translations as means of transmission of knowledge in the long eighteenth century, my main purpose is to examine some of the debates on natural philosophy at the core of the Enlightenment period in an innovative way: by reconsidering the traditional approaches employed within the interdisciplinary field of translation studies. My working hypothesis contends that the Entretiens constituted an open, flexible and porous ‘site of knowledge’ that travelled temporally and geographically across Europe, providing fertile ground for its many translators to revise the scientific ideas of the ‘source’ text through a wide range of paratextual devices and to adapt them to the debates of their times. As a result, these translations became conflictual sites of knowledge, conceptually removed from the original work, while remaining the vehicles of heterogeneous scientific discourses usually dismissed by the simplified narratives of ‘progress’ associated with Enlightenment’s historiographies.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
You need to log in or register to use this function
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.2 - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-TMA-MSCA-PF-EF - HORIZON TMA MSCA Postdoctoral Fellowships - European Fellowships
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) HORIZON-MSCA-2024-PF-01
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
1100 WIEN
Austria
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.