Skip to main content
Go to the home page of the European Commission (opens in new window)
English en
CORDIS - EU research results
CORDIS

Deciding about Future Science: How Scientists Can Collectively Set Research Priorities in the Era of Big Science

Project description

Deciding the future of big science

Today’s scientific experiments are bigger, more complex and costlier than those a half-century ago. Major breakthroughs involve thousands of researchers, mountains of data and massive instruments. With limited funding, deciding which projects to pursue has become a critical challenge. The ERC-funded DECIDE project aims to explore how scientists should make these choices. It will trace the history of collective decision-making in astronomy, astrophysics and cosmology; it will also examine its impact on science and develop a philosophical framework for judging which experiments are worth pursuing and collectively agreeing on this. The goal is to move beyond simple budgets and develop a new philosophical framework. This is an essential look at how scientists can make better, fairer decisions about the next frontier of human discovery.

Objective

Since World War II, we have entered the era of ‘big science’. Experiments in the natural sciences today can involve hundreds or thousands of scientists, they generate enormous amounts of empirical data and they require ever larger instruments. The associated cost of experiments has unsurprisingly also soared. Personal research funds or smaller research grants no longer suffice to fund certain experiments; instead, they require significant financial support from multiple government agencies over a long period of time. Because of this increase in costs, scientists have had to change how they decide what experiments to pursue. The central research question of this project is therefore: how can scientists make optimal decisions about what future experiments to pursue, given the scale of experiments and the limited available resources?
To answer this research question, the project will follow the approach of integrated history and philosophy of science. Through a careful study of the history of one of the most influential procedures for scientific funding decisions, the US Astronomy Decadal Survey, this project will: (i) trace the origins of current procedures for collective decision-making in science; (ii) investigate how these procedures have impacted the development of scientific research, specifically on the post-World War II history of astronomy, astrophysics and cosmology; (iii) formulate a novel philosophical account on what makes an experiment pursuitworthy; and (iv) apply current insights from social epistemology on collective knowledge-making and values and science to a new context, collective setting of research priorities.
Aside from its impact in history and philosophy of science, this project will have implications for the natural sciences by recommending revisions to current strategies for the setting of future research priorities. More broadly, this project will establish the nascent discipline of philosophy of astronomy and astrophysics in Europe.

Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)

Keywords

Programme(s)

Topic(s)

Funding Scheme

HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants

See all projects funded under this funding scheme

Call for proposal

(opens in new window) ERC-2025-STG

See all projects funded under this call

Host institution

STOCKHOLMS UNIVERSITET
Net EU contribution
€ 1 439 198,00
Address
UNIVERSITETSVAGEN 10
10691 Stockholm
Sweden
Region
Östra Sverige Stockholm Stockholms län
Activity type
Higher or Secondary Education Establishments
Links
Total cost
€ 1 439 198,00

Beneficiaries (1)