The comparative analysis has given rise to themes and findings that are featured in relevant publications and contributes to the state of the art. First and foremost, the hybrid methodological approach of semiotic analysis of Greek-Orthodox diasporic religiocultural aesthetics, has now been tested and proven to yield reliable results. It is usable and adaptable to case-studies and different circumstances and can clearly be applied to other types of Eastern Orthodox religioscapes. In that respect, the methodology is expected to be used by other scholars in empirical studies. Further, the dataset that emerged out of the GO Religioscapes study, being made openly available, accessible and interoperable will secure further analyses and meta-analyses that will have GO Religioscapes as a point of reference; more to the point, the dataset is citable as it constitutes a publication in its own right.
Further, the findings of the research study confirm the initial hypothesis that the distinct symbolic points of reference in the public sphere, i.e. places of worship, constitute heterotopias – although not always at first glance – as they are ‘othered’ from the mundane, worldly space. Their consecration renders them sacred, even though, merely the establishment of a religious community contributes decisively in the ontological transformation of sacred space amidst the profane as well. Notwithstanding the distinction between the latter, sacred space is still part of the profane, given that it remains part of the material world, but as such, it demonstrates a dynamism as it reflects the interplay between ontological domains.
Most notably, through, and due to this interplay, the sacred space encompasses codified abstractions of identity and belonging in a material and visual form, i.e. of architecture and religious art; therein, social structures, conditions, particularities and dimensions of power and agency, among others, are identifiable. The emergent themes would be those of ethnicity, nationality, culture, religiosity, spatiality, de- and re-territorialisation, glocality, translocality, supranationality, mutability, hybridity, variable instances of atopia, entopia and heterotopia, and ultimately distinct particularities and senses of collective being and belonging.