Controls on output in fishery are designed to regulate fishing mortality directly. The focus is placed on the economic incentives which drive fishing vessels to exceed quotas or otherwise to confound the manager�s objectives in terms of fishing mortality levels. It also addresses the incentive structure which makes economic outcomes sensitive to the way in which managers implement quota controls.
Viewed as an agency problem, with the regulator as principal and the fishing vessels as agents, the principal has a disutility for catches in excess of the TAC while the agents collectively have a utility for catches in excess of the TAC. The basic problem of quota regulation in fisheries is not a classic agency problem of this type. Firstly, the principal is only interested in the outcome per se and not in the agent�s actions. Secondly, the problem for the principal is trivial if the outcome can be observed. The fundamental real-world difficulty for the principal in the quota regulation problem is to observe the outcome.
The problem has been analyzed by developing qualitative economic models for a number of different cases e.g. single species, multi-species fisheries, individual non-transferable quotas, and individual transferable quotas. Given a fishery quota that is less than the total economic capacity of the fleet, it is axiomatic that there will be incentives to exceed any individual quotas which are applied by the management authority.
The only real practical solution to the problem of over-quota landings and discarding are provided by tradable quota systems, but there will always be some residual incentives to discard marketable fish. The problem is that it is not possible to observe the catches that are the subject for regulation, only the landings. A solution could be to subsidize or tax changes in fish stock size. The importance of non-monetary incentives is recognized and emphasized. The utility of a quota violation can be reduced, possibly to zero, if there are normative or social incentives to comply. Aspects of the overall management system which engender or strengthen non-monetary incentives to comply are important to consider. Linked to this, the asset value acquired by ITQs may considerably influence compliance decisions, particularly where the fishery is organized in such a way that compliance is observed by other fishermen.
1) The study has used a new method from the economic theory of information in the assessment of the TAC/quota regulation of the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) of the EU.
2) The study is carried out in the field of fisheries economics, which to a large extent draws on the same basic theory as environmental economics and conservation of natural resources.
3) The current state-of-the-art is that for practical management purposes, command and control measures are used in quota management of the CFP. Theoretical analysis advice that economic measures should be applied to influence incentives of fishermen. The current state-of-the-art in economic analyses is that they are based on full information. The innovation introduced with our study is the application of the principal-agent method in association with economic incentives estimated by non-numerical economic models of fishermen behavior. In output regulation (TAC and quota) is it difficult to imagine that command, control, and enforcement be totally replaced by subsidies or taxes to correct incentives. The reason is that it is difficult to observe the variable (the catch) which is the target for the regulation. What could be observed is the landings.
4. The implementation of the results does not necessarily require any hardware or software. However, the better the information base the better the management. A good data base is required and does not always exist in many cases, while the required software to calculate economic incentives and quota allocations are available.