Legal, administrative and policy strategies for securing sustainable development of the forestry sector in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine

Informazioni relative al progetto

ID dell’accordo di sovvenzione: INTAS-94-1236

Progetto chiuso

Data di avvio 1 Agosto 1995

Data di completamento 31 Luglio 1997

Finanziato da

• International Association for the promotion of cooperation with scientists from the independent states of the former Soviet Union (INTAS), 1993-

Costo totale

Nessun dato

Contributo UE

€ 35 000,00

Coordinato da

Forest Ecology and Management
Finland

CORDIS fornisce collegamenti ai risultati finali pubblici e alle pubblicazioni dei progetti ORIZZONTE.

I link ai risultati e alle pubblicazioni dei progetti del 7° PQ, così come i link ad alcuni tipi di risultati specifici come dataset e software, sono recuperati dinamicamente da .OpenAIRE .

Risultati sfruttabili

Securing sustainable development of forestry in Russia, Belarus and Ukraine

The forest land in Belarussia, Russia and Ukraine is still managed by state forest institutions. The future contribution of the state forest institutions to the goal of sustainable multiple-use forestry and market economy depends on four major factors: the management and production within task units; the planning system; the development of labour and social services; the resources accessible for the forest sector from state and markets. These factors were analysed in field studies based on written sources and interviews with foresters and scientific experts. The analysis is oriented toward the theory of politics and organizations but the empirical basis is not strong enough to check hypothesis in the scientifically strictly required way. Therefore the analysis looks to the theoretically expected factors and describes them using all empirical information available. On this basis strategies are designed on how the state forest enterprise could contribute to a profitable and sustainable forestry within markets. Strong forestry institutions guarantee sustainability of multiple-user forestry better than other state institutions which today, supporting narrow economic or ecological interests only, have strong influence on forestry in transition. Because of the participation of many different institutions it is nearly impossible to optimize forestry in the complex process of financing and decision making which is now established in the three countries. As an alternative new models for combining financial flows and ecological management in closed productions units are formulated. Further strategies are formulated for rebuilding the technical infrastructure and for enlarging the environmental significance of forestry. Finally the labour management and the resource basis are discussed. In both fields specific solutions for the transition period are suggested.