"Social Responsibility in the Information Society" is a report focusing on the risks and opportunities for business and social capital created by the integration of ICT into society and the eight features of the Information Society.
The case study in collaboration with AOL Europe investigates the potential contribution of business to digital inclusion. The case study identifies the following demand and supply side barriers to promoting digital inclusion:
Demand-side barriers:
Lack of demand
A significant proportion of EU citizens is not online and hqs no interest in being online. Traditionally excluded groups are over-represented among those who are not motivated to go online. Of the 27% of non-users in the EU who are not interested or dont want to use the internet, 40% are retired, 39% are on a low income and 31% are based in home (European Commission, 2001). Ignoring them will only further limit their opportunity to benefit from online opportunities.
Resistance to public internet access points
Public internet access points (PIAPs) are intended to provide a first point of contact with the internet. The term refers to publicly funded internet access terminals in libraries and community centres, privately run internet cafes and internet access kiosks. But PIAPs are not fulfilling their function - 41% of non-users are not interested in public access points under any circumstances. In fact, a study by OFTEL indicates that alternative access points are more popular among people who already have internet access at home (Oftel, 2002).
Lack of awareness
Experience in the UK, the only EU country so far to pursue a mass media internet awareness campaign suggest that ongoing resistance to the internet could benefit from a high profile awareness raising campaign. Internet penetration among low-income individuals in the UK is higher than expected, indicating the success of the UK Online campaign (Booz Allen Hamilton, 2002).
Perceived cost
The low perceived value of the internet among non-users makes cost, or at least perceived cost, a significant barrier to internet access. 47 % of non-users in Germany feel that the cost of access is too high (Kubicek, 2000). In the US, 11 % of non-users stopped going online due to high costs, and in the UK, cost prevents 8 % of non-users going online (Lenhart et al, 2000)(Office of National Statistics, 2001a). When decisions have to be made about how limited household income is spent, perceived value is all-important.
Supply-side barriers:
Inadequate public internet access points
The availability of PIAPS varies dramatically across the EU from 0.45 per 1000 inhabitants in Finland to fewer than 0.05 per 1000 inhabitants in France (European Commission, 2001). There are some noteworthy examples of PIAPs but they are often beset by problems, including: insufficient personnel to offer adequate training; precarious finances that threaten long term sustainability; and outdated or insufficient technology.
Real cost
For Europes lowest income earners, the real price of computer hardware remains a barrier. Estimates are that 15% of the UK population cannot afford to purchase a computer (Department for Education and Skills, 2001). This figure will be far higher in the candidate countries.
Limited availability of flat rate in Europe
Evidence is mounting that online behaviour develops as usage increases. Experienced internet users spend a larger proportion of time online sending emails, doing professional work, looking for news or trading stocks, whilst new users spend a greater proportion of time in chat rooms, playing games and browsing (UCLA, 2001). Time spent online is strongly influenced by pricing packages. In countries with metered access charges, the average person spends 5 to 9 hours a month online. This compares with 32 hours in the USA and 20 hours in New Zealand where a large proportion of users have flat rate access (OECD, 2001). Giving all EU citizens the choice of flat rate narrow band internet access poses a regulatory challenge.
Lack of relevant content
Research indicates that there is still a shortage of content to motivate disadvantaged groups online. A study by The Childrens Partnership in the US identified four content-related barriers to getting disadvantaged communities online. There is a real lack of relevant, particularly local, information and very limited cultural diversity in the content available online. Information is still overwhelmingly in English and tends to be designed for an audience with average or advanced literacy skills (The Childrens Partnership, 2001).