In the beginning of the project prerequisites were created for CICLOP’s experiment to run successfully. Together with all partners, operating points were defined to be tested in the experiment. Two propeller sizes were identified. One propeller set with a diameter of 0.4m and two propeller sets with a diameter of 0.6m were designed and manufactured. In addition to the aerodynamic design, the structural design and the accommodation of the blades also had to be taken into account. As a result of the two sizes, two separate drive trains are necessary, including motors, power electronics, load cells and mountings.
After designing and modelling the assembly was manufactured and built. This includes all mechanical hardware such as wing, propeller drives and support structure, as well as the electronic hardware including power electronics, geared motors and the software to control all components. Furthermore, a measurement setup was developed to store all data. Finally, in a test campaign lasting several months, all points of the previously defined test matrix were successfully performed.
By changing the relative position very close to the wing and below the leading edge, an increase of the maximum lift of up to 34% could be observed. The propeller efficiency also increases in such cases leading to possible optimal positions found through the experiment. The experimental techniques selected allow quantifying the full temporal mean state of the airfoil flow in terms of flow patterns, pressure distribution and laminar-turbulent transition.
Many different configurations were tested during the measurement campaign. In addition to the relative propeller positions and the three different blade designs already mentioned, other operating parameters were varied. On the one hand, the thrust was changed by pitching and thus six thrust levels were performed per blade design, and on the other hand, the flap of the wing was set to three different angles: Clean, Take-Off and Landing. Furthermore, the wind tunnel speed and the propeller rotational speed were also varied. The large number of possible combinations offered by the model was prioritized, so that a total of 188 configurations were tested.
Two scientific papers on the project are currently published. One on the setup from reporting period 1:
Oldeweme, J., T. Lindner, P. Scholz, and J. Friedrichs. 2022. “Experiment Design for a Distributed Propulsion Configuration at High Lift”. In: DLRK. DOI: 10.25967/570125.
And the other on the first measurement results from reporting period 2:
Lindner, T. K., J. Oldeweme, P. Scholz, and J. Friedrichs. 2023. “Experimental Propeller Placement Analysis for a Distributed Propulsion Wing Section in High Lift Configuration”. In: AIAA AVIATION 2023 Forum. DOI: 10.2514/6.2023-3539.
Further results are in the process of being published.