Periodic Reporting for period 1 - miR156evo (The role of the miR156-SPL genetic network during land plant evolution: a comparative analysis of sporophyte development in divergent plant lineages)
Periodo di rendicontazione: 2021-11-01 al 2023-10-31
The land plants we live among and depend on today look very different to the ancestral green alga that first colonised the land. Green algae have basic body plans that are usually restricted to two-dimensions with limited apical growth (i.e. directional proliferative growth facilitated by the self-renewing activity of undifferentiated stem cells). Furthermore, the diploid stage of the life cycle is brief with meiosis occurring immediately following fertilisation. On the other hand, land plants grow in complex 3D structures with extensive apical growth and prolonged diploid development prior to meiosis. What, then, were the critical innovations that led to the establishment of plants on land? With this fundamental question in mind, the aim of this project was to elucidate the ancestral role of a key genetic network in land plants.
To do this we carried out a comparative analysis of gene function in a vascular plant (the flowering plant Arabidopsis) and a bryophyte (the moss Physcomitrium), which arose following an ancient divergence in land plant evolution. Sustained apical growth is a defining feature of vascular plants and the establishment of elaborate shoot systems with delayed reproductive development enabled their extraordinary evolutionary success. In contrast, mosses undergo more transient apical growth prior to rapid reproductive development. In Arabidopsis, a well-studied genetic network regulates apical growth and promotes developmental transitions. However, the role of this module in plant evolution remains to be determined.
Excitingly, early results suggest that this network has an ancestral role in regulating developmental transitions in plants and that the appearance of the network shortly after plants colonised the land was a critical event in plant evolution.
The work has progressed furthest using plants in which either miR156, or a target analog that sequesters miR156 and therefore decreases its activity (named MIM156), is overexpressed. The initial characterisation of these lines has been very encouraging. The manipulation of miR156 appears to regulate Physcomitrium plant shape, leafy shoot initiation and length, leaf shape and reproductive development (as indicated by the accompanying figure). This would indicate that miR156 function emerged in the earliest land plants and its role is not restricted to the vascular plant lineage. Despite the cessation of the Fellowship, we plan to complete this exciting project and anticipate the publication of our findings within the next 12-18 months.