Verification and Language Theory

Informazioni relative al progetto

VERLAN

ID dell’accordo di sovvenzione: 101027412

DOI

10.3030/101027412

Progetto chiuso

Data della firma CE 22 Marzo 2021

Data di avvio 1 Settembre 2021

Data di completamento 26 Agosto 2024

Finanziato da

• EXCELLENT SCIENCE - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

Costo totale

€ 175 572,48

Contributo UE

€ 175 572,48

Coordinato da

UNIVERSITEIT VAN AMSTERDAM
Netherlands

Periodic Reporting for period 1 - VERLAN (Verification and Language Theory)

Periodo di rendicontazione: 2021-09-01 al 2023-08-31

Sintesi del contesto e degli obiettivi generali del progetto

Limitations to a programming language can help boost the production of more readable and maintainable software. A limited fragment associated with the semantic domain can introduce more efficient algorithms for verification and analysis, beginning with the characterization of the semantic domain. The EU-funded VERLAN project reviewed the semantic domains of fragments of programming languages under a formal language theory perspective. VERLAN studied mathematical frameworks to categorize formal languages and derive new algorithms for three fundamental problems in program verification: refactoring, equivalence checking, and learning. The research was carried out at the Institute for Logic, Language, and Computation (ILLC).

The main conclusions of the action are threefold.
(1) Where refactoring is concerned, it was discovered that program behavior without "goto" statements is closely connected to a recently solved problem in process algebra.
(2) For equivalence checking, it was shown that several fragments of programming languages admit tractable equivalence checking.
(3) For learning, it was found out that restricted behavior may come with a more complex representation, which encumbers learning algorithms.

Lavoro eseguito dall’inizio del progetto fino alla fine del periodo coperto dalla relazione e principali risultati finora ottenuti

The work performed over the course of the project was divided among the three themes of the action.

Refactoring: The action looked into the feasibility of certain refactoring operations. In limited settings, such as one where the packet scheduling behavior of a network device must be organized to work on particular hardware, it was shown that refactoring is possible and in fact feasible (this result was published at OOPSLA 2024). Progress was also made towards a characterization of program behavior that *requires* the use of non-local control flow (e.g. "goto" statements), and can thus not be refactored to avoid these (part of the results were published at ESOP 2022; other work is currently under submission at a conference).

Equivalence checking: The possibility of verifying the correctness of a refactoring operation after-the-fact was researched, and this was also found to be feasible in limited cases (this result is currently under submission at a conference). Moreover, several fragments of programming languages were identified, including the parsing sub-language of P4, a programming language for network switches, and a limited subset of traditional ("while-based") programming languages that include probabilistic behavior. For these fragments, tractable equivalence checking algorithms were developed that relied on the simplification that arose from looking only at the fragment (these results were published at PLDI 2021 and ICALP 2023 respectively).

Learning: Because restricted fragments of programming languages may have a more complex representation, no new learning algorithms were found. However, an existing learning algorithm due to Angluin was generalized to learn program behavior where certain equations hold, thus constituting a limited fragment (this result was published at CMCS 2022).

Progressi oltre lo stato dell’arte e potenziale impatto previsto (incluso l’impatto socioeconomico e le implicazioni sociali più ampie del progetto fino ad ora)

The work performed over the course of the project advances the state of the art in several ways, and has potential for socioeconomic impact in the long term.

For refactoring, the project demonstrated that certain methods of programmable packet scheduling can be implemented, and then refactored to run on fixed hardware. This strikes a balance between flexibility (in terms of scheduling algorithms that can be programmed) and efficiency (by the use of special-purpose hardware). If programmable packet scheduling takes off, this development may find its way into industrial network hardware.

Within the same theme, our progress towards a characterization of program behavior that requires non-local control flow is general, and can indeed be used to argue similar properties of programming languages that contain non-traditional or unusual primitives for control flow. This is the first time such a result goes beyond existing and well-known control flow constructs such as "if" and "while". Developments here are mainly theoretical at the time of reporting, but may pay practical dividends later on.

For equivalence checking, advances were made to verify the correctness of refactoring post hoc. This is the first time an algorithm was developed for this problem at the level of control flow verification. The algorithm may be applied as a way to validate complex program transformations that can be hard to verify in general, as well as in decompilation. Other algorithms developed during the project, such as the equivalence checking algorithm for while-based programs with probabilistic behavior, could have similar applications within probabilistic programming.

The learning algorithm developed goes beyond an earlier variation of Angluin's algorithm to learn program behavior represented in the form of trees, and in fact our work provides a common perspective on both Angluin's classical algorithm and this variation. The framework that covers this algorithm can be instantiated to learn different types of program behavior.

Behavior that requires non-local control flow