Project description
Divisive issues within international peace organisations
In the complex interplay of decolonisation and the Cold War, peace movements navigated many challenges in their attempts to build broad international coalitions for peace. While activists shared overarching goals, differing methods hindered cohesive collaboration. Incorporating a focus on decolonisation and moving beyond the Cold War narrative, the ERC-funded RECONPAX project historicises peace work. The project will delve into core elements of peace work (conscientious objection, non-proliferation, maternalist and anti-imperialist thought) to unravel how different understandings of these concepts shaped the possibilities and constraints of international coalition-building for peace. RECONPAX asserts that the success or failure of international coalitions for peace hinged on local and historical contingencies.
Objective
                                How did peace movements act upon the interlinked processes of decolonization and the Cold War? And how did these processes, in turn, impact the ability of peace movements to come together in large international organizations for peace? RECONPAX studies attempts to build large international coalitions for peace in the period 1918-1970. It departs from the assumption that, while peace activists reached out to each other in pursuit of shared goals, they did not necessarily share common methods. Attempts to include organizations from the decolonizing world in existing international bodies brought different understandings of peace work to the surface. In short, the necessary preconditions for a peaceful international order were both locally and historically contingent.
This project brings historical depth to an issue of continuing relevance to the international order. It challenges the historiographical focus on the Cold War as the primary factor in the development of international peace organizations. It does so in two ways: by taking a longue durée perspective that incorporates precedents set by peace movements after the First World War; and by turning the lens on decolonization rather than on superpower competition. RECONPAX hypothesizes that the challenges posed by decolonization and the end of empire were the dominant drivers of success and failure in building international coalitions for peace. 
A four-person team consisting of two PhD researchers, a Postdoc and the PI will study these dynamics from four different, complementary vantage points, all divisive issues in the peace organizations of the postwar decades: conscientious objection to military service in the decolonizing world (PhD1), non-proliferation in the decolonizing world (PhD2), peace in maternalist thought (Postdoc), and peace in anti-imperialist thought (PI). Together, they will reveal how these issues shaped the possibilities and constraints of international coalition building.
                            
                                Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
                                                                                                            
                                            
                                            
                                                CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See:   The European Science Vocabulary.
                                                
                                            
                                        
                                                                                                
                            
                                                                                                CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
                                Keywords
                                
                                    
                                    
                                        Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
                                        
                                    
                                
                            
                            
                        Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
            Programme(s)
            
              
              
                Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
                
              
            
          
                      Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
- 
                  HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
                                      MAIN PROGRAMME
                                    
 See all projects funded under this programme
            Topic(s)
            
              
              
                Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
                
              
            
          
                      
                  Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
            Funding Scheme
            
              
              
                Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
                
              
            
          
                      Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
              Call for proposal
                
                  
                  
                    Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
                    
                  
                
            
                          Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2023-STG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
2311 EZ Leiden
Netherlands
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.
 
           
        