We successfully recruited ~6,000 women who provided cervical samples across the consortium. We implemented a novel laboratory pipeline for processing and analysis of epigenome wide methylation data from complex multicellular sample mixtures. We developed and successfully validated multiple WID tests as set out at the start of the programme. When assessing cervical smears, these indices demonstrated clinically relevant levels of performance that enable: 1) identification of HPV+ve cytology normal smears [WID-HPV-Index – a test that we have furthermore shown to inform whether an individual has mounted an adequate defensive response to HPV infection], 2) identification of CIN3+ in cervical smears [WID-CIN-Index – a test that can also be used to predict future development of CIN3+ and outperforms current cytology triage pathways], 3) breast cancer diagnosis and determination of BRCA status [WID-BC-Index – a test which outperforms current SNP-based risk prediction models, 5) ovarian cancer diagnosis and risk prediction [WID-OC-Index], and, 6) endometrial cancer diagnosis and risk prediction [WID-EC-Index]. In addition we developed a DNA methylation test [WID-LO Index] that identifies women with an aberrant cervico-vaginal microbiome that is in turn associated with ovarian cancer risk and BRCA1 germline mutation status.
We produced a series of successful sub studies investigating risk perception, knowledge of female cancer risk and current screening programmes, attitudes and beliefs regarding predictive cancer testing and risk-dependent considerations of preventive surgery among European women and leading to several scientific publications. Furthermore, ethical, legal, and regulatory issues for the implementation of omics-based risk prediction of women's cancer have been explored in additional published articles.
We have produced recommendations for personalised screening/prevention based upon WID-test information. We developed several decision-analytic models for each of the female cancers and target groups of interest (cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, BRCA-specific breast and ovarian cancer). We evaluated these models together with systematically assessed model input parameters for different countries. Furthermore, we adapted and applied the developed decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of WID-test based screening (WID-HPV and CIN3+ Indices) as a primary or triage test for HPV-positivity in cervical cancer screening programmes.
We established a working group (ENVISION team) comprising the coordinators of six EU H2020 funded consortia (FORECEE, BRCA-ERC, B-CAST, BRIDGES, MyPeBS, EU-TOPIA) and organised the joint EU ENVISION (European Collaborative on Early Diagnosis, Personalised Care and Prevention of Breast Cancer) Conference, which took place in June 2019 inclusive in Hall in Tirol, Austria. The conference stakeholders, including policymakers, healthcare professionals, managers, lay public, voluntary organisations and researchers, identified strategies to integrate omics-based screening and prevention into routine clinical practice. A consensus paper is now being published in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.
Finally, we ensured dissemination and engagement with the public via the FORECEE website, a multimedia presentation that was produced in August 2018 and linked up with the ENGAGe Executive Committee (which ensured awareness regarding the study and of our early findings), and more recently, a public engagement event “Informationsveranstaltung Brustkrebs – Risiko, Früherkennung, Vorbeugung” (Breast Cancer Information Event - Risk, Early Detection, Prevention) held on 26 June 2019 at ORF (Österreichischer Rundfunk, an Austrian national public service broadcaster), Innsbruck, Austria. A comprehensive strategy for the advancement of the WID tests for use in clinical practice has been defined and is currently being rolled out. The major barriers to commercial implementation of WID tests have been identified and a plan put in place to overcome these.