The overarching aim of the project was to develop A NEW HERMENEUTICS FOR COMPUTATIONAL ‘LAW’, which implies DOING LEGAL THEORY WITH COMPUTER SCIENTISTS and a novel CROSS-DISCIPLINARY METHODOLOGY to rethink and reinvent legal method.
1. As part of a new hermeneutics for computational law, we developed dedicated VOCABULARIES OF COMPUTER SCIENCE TERMS and FOUNDATIONAL LEGAL CONCEPTS, to detect how the introduction of a new vocabulary may impact the meaning of the foundational legal concepts, see:
https://publications.cohubicol.com/vocabularies/law(öffnet in neuem Fenster) grounded in the Research Study on Text-Driven Law:
https://publications.cohubicol.com/research-studies/text-driven-law/(öffnet in neuem Fenster) and:
https://publications.cohubicol.com/vocabularies/cs/(öffnet in neuem Fenster) see also the Research Study on Computational law:
https://publications.cohubicol.com/research-studies/computational-law/(öffnet in neuem Fenster).
2. The computer science vocabularies of code- and data-driven legal technologies were developed while constructing and configuring the TYPOLOGY OF LEGAL TECHNOLOGIES, a method, a mindset and a resource, meant to inform lawyers and developers of legal technologies about claimed and actual functionality.
3. To disseminate, develop and foster the cross-disciplinary method that is key to the new hermeneutics of computational law, the PI founded a new scientific journal, together with postdoctoral researcher Laurence Diver: the JOURNAL OF CROSS-DISCIPLINARY RESEARCH IN COMPUTATIONAL LAW (CRCL). The Journal is a peer reviewed online diamond Open Acces Journal, neither the authors nor the subscribers or visitors pay for access. See
https://journalcrcl.org/crcl/index(öffnet in neuem Fenster). The added value of the Journal is to be found in its unique format. After a paper has been accepted following double blind peer review by reviewers from the discipline(s) of the authors, the editors invite a brief cross-disciplinary reply by a scholar or scientist from ‘the other discipline’ that is followed by a response of the author(s).
4. Conceptual innovation
The proposal foregrounded three interrelated concepts as framing instruments to rethink the nature of law and the rule of law: (1) ‘affordances’ (2) ‘mode of existence’ of modern positive law and (3) ‘legal protection by design’ that highlights the need to deliberately design the emerging computational ICI in ways that safeguard and enhance legal protection rather than diminishing it, calling for close collaboration between lawyers and computers scientists. In the Research Study on Text-Driven Law, the COHUBICOL Team has explored the relevance of these framing concepts in the context of rethinking the foundational concepts of modern positive law, thus helping to demonstrate their added value, see
https://publications.cohubicol.com/research-studies/text-driven-law/chapter-3/(öffnet in neuem Fenster).
5. From the very beginning we invested in NEW WAYS OF PUBLISHING SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH, via our website www.cohubicol.com. This notably concerns the interrelated project outputs of the Typology, the Law and CS vocabs, and the two Research Studies. Though webtools and html text are not new in themselves, the integrated, dynamic and cross-referential nature of the COHUBICOL website turns it into an interesting example of how to share, present, navigate and access research findings.