Project description
Exploring collective attitudes towards the formulation of facts
People tend to intentionally assign attitudes, like beliefs or preferences, to individuals and also to groups. Statements that ascribe attitudes to collectives, such as 'ordinary people want…', are used by media and public figures and can also be found in numerous theoretical models in the social sciences. This, however, can be easily contested and requires more rigorous foundations in theory. In this context, the EU-funded GROUNDS project will transform our understanding of collective representation, its nature and its significance and build new foundations for collective attitudes and representational states (group belief and group desire). The project will develop and defend a substantive, realist interpretationism, by revealing the underlying unity between the facts that constitute the beliefs and desires of individuals, and the facts that constitute the beliefs and desires of groups.
Objective
This project builds new foundations for collective attitudes and representational states: group belief and group desire. The
platform is the PI’s recent advances in the metaphysics of representation for individual representational states, where he
develops and defends a substantive, realist interpretationism: (i) what it is to believe/desire that p is for the selected
interpretation to attribute that belief/desire to them; (ii) the selected interpretation is that which makes the subject most
reason-responsive, given the way they act and the evidence available to them. This project leverages this work to construct
a common structure for the metaphysics of group representation and individual representation, isolating parameters that
differentiate the cases and theorizing the distinctive ingredients of the group case.
The first phase of the work places group representation in context, studying the theoretical deployments of group attitudes,
and dependencies between accounts of individual representation, group representation and linguistic representation. The
second phase lays the basis on which interpretations of individuals and groups are selected---individual and joint action,
and individual and joint evidence. An account of such facts must be given prior to and independent of belief and desire, on
pain of circularity in the overall account. The third phase examines the relation between foundations of representation and
metaphysics of persistence---required if the basis for interpretation is to be modally and temporally extended. The fourth
shows how key issues in the theory of normative reasons will impact the metaphysics of content, given appeal to reasons responsiveness at the heart of the account. The fifth phase identifies the boundaries between realist and anti-realist accounts of group thought.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
H2020-EU.1.1. - EXCELLENT SCIENCE - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
ERC-COG - Consolidator Grant
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2018-COG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
LS2 9JT Leeds
United Kingdom
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.