Periodic Reporting for period 3 - PANTROP (Biodiversity and recovery of forest in tropical landscapes)
Berichtszeitraum: 2022-09-01 bis 2024-02-29
Aims- This study aims to understand and predict the resilience of tropical forests to human-driven disturbance by analyzing the effects of (1) continent and biogeography, (2) climate, (3) landscape, and (4) biodiversity on forest recovery rate.
Approach- We will use a pantropical approach by synthesizing current data and doing controlled experiments on three continents (Neotropics, Africa, and Australia) in climatically contrasting forest types (dry and wet forest). We will (1) assess long-term recovery of multiple facets of tropical forests after agricultural use, by expanding a unique Neotropical network of 60 sites to the pantropics, (2) analyse the role of the landscape (i.e. the spatial distribution of remaining forest patches and trees) on forest recovery by doing a natural experiment along forest cover gradients, (3) understand how different kinds of diversity, such as dominant species and rare species, affect succession and ecosystem functioning through a biodiversity removal experiment.
Impact- This study addresses key questions in ecology and advances our understanding how human-driven climate change, landscape degradation, and biodiversity loss affect forest resilience and succession. The insights can be applied to (1) reduce human impacts on tropical forests, (2) design resilient and multifunctional tropical landscapes, and (3) design effective forest restoration strategies.
Where can you follow us?- You can follow PANTROP via our website (pantrop-eu.com) Twitter (@PantropEu), or Instagram (pantrop_eu).
General- A kickstart workshop was held in Mexico (Nov. 2019) to sharpen the project aims and measurement protocols. Fieldwork started in Nov 2019, was interrupted in March 2020 because of Covid, when staff had to return to the Netherlands for safety reasons, causing a 1-1.5 year delay. Now we are on steam again.
S1 Pantropical- This study compares forest recovery across continents by synthesizing chronosequence data. By comparing forests that differ in time since agricultural fields were abandoned, we can assess recovery.
● DATABASE EXPANSION. We have expanded the secondary forest database from 50 Latin American sites to >100 sites across the tropics, including 2 new PANTROP-chronosequence sites in Ghana.
● PREVIOUS LAND USE AFFECTS REGROWTH. We synthesized the current knowledge on how previous land use affects forest regrowth and proposed a framework to support the design of forest restoration actions
(Jakovac et al 2021 Biological Reviews).
● TROPICAL FORESTS CAN RECOVER SURPRISINGLY FAST. We published end 2021 a paper in Science (Poorter et al. 2021 Science) where we have analysed recovery of 12 forest attributes across 77 chronosequence
sites and found that tropical forests that regrow naturally on abandoned agricultural fields are surprisingly resilient: After 20 years they attain, on average, 78% of the values of neighbouring old-growth
forests.
● FAST RECOVERY BECAUSE OF MANY LEGACIES AND PRODUCTIVE CONDITIONS. Recovery is so fast because there are many legacies in the forest soil, such as seeds, resprouting tree stumps, and a well-developed
soil layer. In addition, tropical environments tend to be productive, with high temperature and rainfall throughout the year that fuel growth
● RECOVERY DIFFERS AMONGST FOREST ATTRIBUTES. Recovery (to 90% of old-growth forest values) differs strongly amongst forest attributes; it is fastest for soil fertility (less than 10 years) and for plant
functioning (less than 25 years), intermediate for structure and species diversity (25-60 years), and slowest for aboveground biomass and species composition (more than 120 years).
● NATURAL REGROWTH AS A NATURE-BASED SOLUTION. These results indicate that natural regrowth can be used as a nature based solution for ecosystem restoration, climate change mitigation, and biodiversity
conservation. The conditions are that previous land use has not been too extensive, too intense, or too long, and that there is sufficient forests or seed trees in the neighbourhood.
S2 Landscape & S3 Diversity. These field experiments analyze how forest recovery is affected by landscape forest cover (FC) and biodiversity (BD).
● PLOT ESTABLISHMENT. Fieldwork was interrupted and delayed because of Covid. We have established and monitored in Mexico 40 FC plots and 16 BD plots, in Ghana 42 FC and 6 BD plots. In Australia we have
established 39 FC plots. We now monitor how the forest develops, and how biodiversity affects forest productivity.
● A NATURE-BASED SOLUTION FOR GLOBAL TARGETS. Given the local and global importance of secondary forests and their rapid recovery after 20 years (on average 78%, range 33-100%) under suitable social,
economic and environmental conditions, we encourage adoption of (assisted) natural regeneration as a low-cost, nature-based solution ecosystem restoration, climate change mitigation, and biodiversity
conservation. This allows to meet the goals of the United Nations’ sustainable development, the UN decade of Ecosystem Restoration (2020-2030), UN framework on climate change mitigation (COP 26), and the
Convention of Biological Diversity (COP 15).
● A MIX OF RESTORATION APPROACHES IS NEEDED. We recommend to preserve all old-growth forests as little is left, use natural regrowth where you can, and plant where you need to.
● THREE SIMPLE INDICATORS TO MONITOR FOREST RESTORATION SUCCESS. Maximum tree size, forest structural heterogeneity (that is, a large variation in tree sizes), and tree species richness are relatively easy to
measure and robust indicators of multidimensional recovery (Poorter et al. 2021 Science).
● DRY AND WET FORESTS REQUIRE DIFFERENT SPECIES FOR RESTORATION. Early successional tree species in wet and dry forests differ markedly in their traits; wet forests have traits that increase growth rates in a
productive, wet, environment whereas dry forests have traits that allow trees to avoid, delay, or tolerate drought in a seasonally dry environment (Poorter et al. 2021 Proceedings of the National Academy of
Scienses). Hence, species selection for active restoration should be fined-tuned to local site conditions.
● A CENTURY OF SUCCESSIONAL THEORIES. We reviewed 100 years of successional studies and 19 successional theories (Poorter et al. 2023 Biological Reviews). Successional theories have increased in scale and scope (from patch
and plant to ecosystems, landscapes, and socio-ecological systems), reflecting the increasingly broader perspective on succession over time.
● A COMPREHENSIVE SUCCESSIONAL FRAMEWORK. We present a framework to analyse in a standardized way succession across the globe, and to get a better insight in the relevant successional processes and the underling drivers
and mechanisms (Poorter et al. 2024 Ecosphere).