VIS-À-VIS consists of 6 work packages (WPs), each addressing a particular challenge:
WP1 aims at understanding if the kinematics of eye movements are related to why the rapid motion that they cause on the retina is not seen. Using exceptionally high-speed visual displays, we uncovered a tight coupling between saccadic eye movements (the fastest movements of the retinal surface) and a fundamental perceptual process in human vision (seeing objects moving at high speeds): The speed limit of perceiving a stimulus’ rapid motion from one location to the next is directly proportional to the speed of saccadic eye movements over the same distance. We showed further that the visual statistics of natural scenes strongly impact perceptual omission of visual motion smear during saccades. In both cases, a parsimonious visual mechanisms based on the interplay of the retinal consequences of eye movements and processes in early visual areas can explain the results.
WP2 explores the origin of lawful mutual relations between visual action and perception. We have found ways to reliably manipulate the lawful mutual relations between visual action and perception, relying on pace-based or reward-based manipulations of motor behavior (and, thus, its visual consequences) and gaze-contingent image motion. These allow us to test hypotheses about the consequences of such manipulations for the visual system and its coupling to motor control. For instance, we have already shown people with fast saccades can perceive objects moving at higher speeds than people with slow saccades. Moreover, we established a link between eye-movement kinematics and storage of visual information in short-term memory and showed that saccades engage processes that enable spatial generalization of perceptual skills.
In WP3, we ask if the high-speed motion that saccades impose on the retina may help the visual system to keep track of objects over time. We have now demonstrated specific visual consequences of saccadic eye movements (motion smear across the retina) indeed aid establishing object correspondence across successive fixations of the eyes. We continue to explore the role of these sensory consequences in object continuity and feature integration in trans-retinal movements during both saccades and passive fixation.
WP4 links lawful sensory consequences of visual actions to causality and agency. Initial results show that visual signals alone can cause temporal recalibration of the association between saccadic eye movements and their visual consequences. Moreover, we have used high-speed displays to render visual information visible during microsaccades or catch-up saccades during smooth pursuit eye movements and discovered that human observers have little-to-none awareness of their own oculomotor behavior both in the presence and absence of saccade-contingent retinal stimulation.
In WP5, we integrate the empirical knowledge gained to synthesize a new theory of active vision. We have developed a framework that distinguishes three types of sensory consequences of actions: intended consequences, intrinsic consequences, and incidental consequences, integrated what we currently know about incidental consequences of visual actions (e.g. the massive motion signals introduced saccades or the transients imposed by eye blinks), and developed hallmarks for different degrees of coupling between perception and action.
Finally, in WP6, we are setting up a novel 360-degree screen that will extend the scope of our experimental tools to enable the study of large-scale visual actions (combined eye-head-body movements) rather than just saccadic eye movements.