O1: This Objective is linked to WPs 3, 4 and 5 and covers issues related to Cognition and ReconfigurationTo match the objective regarding Cognition, we have performed a review of best practices and tools for monitoring and autonomously understand whether CPSoS matches the functional and non-functional requirements expressed in KPIs (Section 7 of D1.1 Submitted on M6). Regarding the configuration, identification of appropriate tools to support reconfiguration eg. using Xlinx Vitis platform and the latest FPGA of Xilinx has been made.
O2: This objective is directly linked with WPs 3,4 and 5and covers issues related to scene analysis, 3D perception, user state monitoring, localization, path planning and their application in the automotive and manufacturing pillar. More importantly, the cooperative and decentralized fusioning of extracted information from different modalities, towards solving problems related to CPSs localization, user state evaluation and path planning have been thoroughly investigated.
O3: We conducted extensive charting of alternatives for simulation models (as part of T2.2) to extend and utilize in the CPSoSAware’s inter and intra communication modeling needs. A working demonstrator of the distributed event synchronization capability was implemented. In addition, a LLVM-based profiler, extracting the instruction characteristics of the OpenCL SW modules, has been developed. An initial planning for a HiTL supported architecture has been made, while the use of Application Simulators (e.g Carla) as a physical environment model and simulation mechanism is going to be deployed in order to feed synthetic data on the HiTL modelling approach.
O4: i) A review of security by design and run time security monitoring state of the art was performed.ii) KPI definition for security non functional requirements iii) Mechanisms have been specified regarding the security primitives to ensure security goals iv) An architecture and prototype implementation of the CPSoSaware Security Runtime monitoring tool has been created.
O5: This objective is directly linked with the implementation of increasing driver’s situational awareness through Augmented Reality occlusion rendering. Moreover, part of the work linked with this objective focused on the problem of users' motion tracking, lying in industrial environments, in order to increase the level of safeness while they co-work or collaborate with robots sharing the same workspace.
O6:The first year of the project few integration activities were made since integration is primarily done in WP5. However, there were several preparatory activities on how to link the project solution/outcomes with the two use case pilots. More specifically, efforts have been made to: i) Create appropriate use case requirements and scenarios, ii) Produce/implement plan for the experiments of the quantification campaigns, iii) Define preliminary version of the assessment protocol, iv) Define testing scenarios, identify the expected behaviour of the system in the two use-cases.
O7: A preliminary version on the IPR document issues which has been provided led by RTC, in line with the Market analysis and as a first yet thorough approximation planning to of the Exploitation strategy has been performed. During the next reporting period, the above document issues will be enriched in line with the Exploitation Plan. Several Business Model Canvas (BMC) have been included in the corresponding deliverables.
