At the start of streamSAVE, an extensive stakeholder consultation showed that there are savings potentials that have not been adequately covered by existing bottom-up methodologies. As for other methodologies that are already available, Member States find it difficult to identify the baseline or calculation values for the savings estimations in accordance with the Energy Efficiency Directive 2018/2002/EU (EED). streamSAVE, therefore, identified ten Priority Actions, such as Heat recovery, Building automation and control Systems (BACS), Behavioural changes, and Modal shift for freight transport. For these Priority Actions, standardised calculation methodologies, indicative calculation values including guidelines on Member States’ customisation, cost parameters and related CO2 savings were developed. Public authorities and other stakeholders have easy access to and can practice these new bottom-up calculation methodologies into the platform (
https://streamsave.flexx.camp/training(si apre in una nuova finestra)).
The sharing of experiences among Member States is facilitated by streamSAVE’s lively community of experts. In total, 20 peer-to-peer dialogues have been organized, in which stakeholders discuss technical and economical details about the Priority Actions. Additionally, the streamSAVE platform and online forum enable the continuous exchange of knowledge. The dialogues were scheduled in close collaboration with the H2020 projects ENSMOV, CA EED, SocialWatt and DEESME. According to the participants’ feedback, the dialogues resulted in a better understanding of key issues and practices related to savings calculations in other EU countries.
In the Capacity Support Facility, the 10 partner Member States received one-to-one technical support which resulted in the real-case application and validation of the bottom-up calculation methodologies and related indicative values. Across the ten Member States, 30 energy efficiency policies are (potentially) improved covering the identified Priority Actions which are characterized by a considerable, unexploitable energy savings potential. In addition, three new Member States - Slovakia, Italy and Cyprus - learned about and practiced the streamSAVE methodologies.
At the end of the project, the streamSAVE community increased to 208 stakeholders who are willing to continuously share experiences and good practices on calculation bottom-up methodologies. Synergies were established with other projects whose duration goes beyond streamSAVE’s end, such as ENSMOV Plus, ODYSSEE-MURE, and CA EED. These outcomes form an important pillar in the continuation of the streamSAVE platform and community of experts after the project duration.
The communication and dissemination efforts allowed to build up a strong and steady presence of the streamSAVE project. With a community of 210 followers on LinkedIn, 425 followers on Twitter, 176 newsletter registrants, and over 50,000 page views on the website in 3 years, it is considered that the streamSAVE online messages reached out to a high number of people. The events successfully engaged the broad energy and climate community too, with significant participation rates, including an average of 111 attendees for industry webinars and more than 100 for two industry workshops. The public availability of the streamSAVE results promotes continuous access, encouraging stakeholders to enhance EED implementation in Europe.