On the European Shag population, we found unprecedenting evidence that migration can affect later decision, namely Dispersal and that both decisions could be part of a same syndrome.
Besides, we showed that dispersal and migration, seperately and in association have both an impact in individual reproductive success, but this is subject also to changes depending on local environmental conditions.
On the other species, we showed that location of breeding within a colony will impact which space individual utilize to forage and feed, and that individuals breeding in different parts of a same colony will segregate when feeding. This is important to consider also the the project on EUropean Shag which breed in colonies. This led us to differentiate mini-subcolonies when considering dispersal for the main project on European shags.
We also showed that the segregation while foraging of individuals from different subcolonies was important from a conservation aspect. Of people (researchers, stake-holders) do not take into account such segregation in colonial species like the European Shags and others when deriving Areas of Conservation Interest, then they are strongly biasing these Areas and jeopardizing the conservation of the species, or at least the efficiency of conservation measures.