Evaluation of the possible transmission of prions (scrapie and bse) to different fish species

Projektinformationen

TSE AND FISH

ID Finanzhilfevereinbarung: QLK5-CT-2002-00866

Startdatum 1 Dezember 2002

Enddatum 30 November 2007

Finanziert unter

• Specific Programme for research, technological development and demonstration on "Quality of life and management of living resources", 1998-2002

Gesamtkosten € 2 058 876,00

EU-Beitrag € 1 304 432,00

Koordiniert durch

CENTRE FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY HELLAS
Greece

Leistungen

Residual mammalian PrPSc contamination of fish tissues for some days after force-feeding

Our results are relevant for public policy making concerning food safety and directed scientific research funding. At present there is a temporary EU-wide ban on the use of fishmeal in ruminant feed that has been in place since 2001. Any consideration to lifting of this ban must include a scientific assessment on the potential risk of spreading BSE to ruminants through consumption of fishmeal and our project results provide crucial information for such an assessment. We have found that after ingestion, PrPSc can remain in fish intestine for a period of days, and that the duration of this persistence varies with both the species of fish and the TSE source. The bulk of ingested PrPSc is cleared from the fish and does not cross the intestinal barrier of fish. However, results from mouse bioassays indicate that residual TSE- associated infectivity present in challenged fish during this ’persistence period’(days) is able to cross the gastrointestinal barrier to contaminate other tissues. Thus, there could be a potential hazard of residual TSE infectivity in fishmeal produced from fish recently fed with TSE-contaminated feed. This information must be taken into account during any consideration of lifting the current ban on fishmeal.

Oral administration of mammalian-derived TSE-infected brain material to fish may result in the abnormal brain deposits

Our results are relevant for public policy making concerning food safety and directed scientific research funding. At present there is a temporary EU-wide ban on the use of fishmeal in ruminant feed that has been in place since 2001. Any consideration to lifting of this ban must include a scientific assessment on the potential risk of spreading BSE to ruminants through consumption of fishmeal and our project results provide crucial information for such an assessment. We have found that months after BSE ingestion, sea bream develop protease-K resistant brain lesions, whereas control fish do not. This information must be taken into account during any consideration of lifting the current ban on fishmeal. Additionally, it points up the need for further scientific investigation on the transmissibility of this abnormal, TSE-associated brain pathology to other fish and to higher vertebrates.