Skip to main content
Go to the home page of the European Commission (opens in new window)
English en
CORDIS - EU research results
CORDIS

Article Category

Article available in the following languages:

What kind of digital society do Europeans want to live in?

INNOVADE describes four possible futures in a white paper that maps different scenarios for digital democracy.

As digital technologies increasingly permeate every facet of public life, their impact on democratic governance remains uncertain. Will digitalisation empower citizens or entrench autocracy? A new white paper(opens in new window) published under the EU-funded INNOVADE(opens in new window) project tackles this critical question by outlining four distinct scenarios for digital democracy in 2050. Titled ‘The Futures of Digital Democracy’, the document moves beyond prediction, employing “realist science fiction” to stimulate public debate about the kind of digital future society desires. Written by a research team from INNOVADE project partner Paderborn University, Germany, the white paper combines scenario planning methods with socio-cultural, technological, economic, environmental and political analyses to construct four narratives of where digital society might end up. The resulting scenarios diverge along two axes: the mode of societal organisation (authoritarianism versus democracy) and the mode of governance (representative versus participatory).

From blatant to insidious authoritarianism

The starkest warning comes in the form of representative digital authoritarianism. In this scenario, there is a totalitarian regime in which a single-party dictatorship leverages technology for absolute control. Propaganda and mass surveillance are used to eliminate dissent and state-monopolised capitalism prioritises unrestricted profit over worker rights or environmental protection. Renewable energy is outlawed in favour of fossil fuels. Participatory digital authoritarianism presents a pseudo-democracy – “a softer form of autocracy with a democratic façade.” Here, a veneer of freedom masks deep control. People who criticise the regime may not be punished by legal rules, but they end up as outsiders who are socially shunned by others. While formally embracing democratic processes, digital technologies essentially support pro-regime interests. The minimally regulated capitalist economy is dominated by regime-aligned oligopolies.

More positive outlooks

The first hopeful pathway outlined in the paper is representative digital democracy. This scenario envisions a system where elected bodies govern with the aid of regulated digital tools whose purpose is to augment the political process and make governance more open, transparent and accountable. There is strong data protection and the state invests in renewable energy and regulates industry to cut emissions. The most transformative vision, participatory digital democracy, describes a highly citizen-centric society that encourages critical thinking, discourse and participation. In this future, technology follows a human-first, open-source approach. A mixed economy dominated by public, cooperative and non-profit enterprises supports a dynamic civic culture where decisions are made through online citizen assemblies and non-commercial digital platforms rather than top-down mandates. By exploring possible futures, the white paper encourages us to ask ourselves what kind of digital society we aspire to create. To further this dialogue, the INNOVADE (INNOVAtive DEmocracy through digitalisation) project hosted a free online seminar(opens in new window) on 26 May. During the event, the team presented the four scenarios, their methodology and findings, inviting the public to discuss which of these futures we must strive for and which to prevent. A recording(opens in new window) of the seminar is available on YouTube. For more information, please see: INNOVADE project website(opens in new window)

My booklet 0 0