InTaVia moved beyond the scientific and technological state of the art on several levels:
(1) Currently, cultural information is mostly stored in “silos”, i.e. isolated databases containing cultural heritage and history information. InTaVia developed methods and tools to interlink different databases - with different kinds of cultural assets, different languages, and different data models. We developed the InTaVia data model (IDM, building on CIDOC CRM) and reconciled information from different biographical and object databases with it.
(2) In cultural heritage research fields, a lot of information is stored in textual format. For their interlinking in knowledge graphs like the IKG, structured data has to be created from such texts. InTaVia further developed methods of natural language processing and artificial intelligence to create structured data and relations from textual information.
(3) Until now, interactive visual interfaces did focus either on persons or on cultural objects, but were not able to handle different kinds of entities. The visualizations developed within InTaVia represent objects, persons, but also places and organizations, in a coherent fashion and thereby enable their integrated visual analysis and communication.
(4) While some methods used for the development of theInTaVia are not new, the InTaVia platform is the first of its kind, which supports the full practitioner workflow from searching for information, to the creation of new data, the curation of erroneous data, its visual analysis, and its narrative communication.
(5) The InTaVia project consortium makes its results, methods, and prototypes fully and openly accessible for re-use by the scientific community, European research infrastructures, GLAM institutions, and cultural and creative industries. Open workflows and APIs allow the ingestion of further data to the IKG, the import of local data to the platform, and the re-use in other tools.
With these innovations, the InTaVia consortium expects these developments to have a notable and measurable impact on the local and global promotion of Europe's cultural heritage, on the analysis and understanding of cultural history, on future practices of curating digital assets, and on their use and re-use in various fields including Academia, education, cultural tourism, cultural journalism, and creative industries.