Periodic Reporting for period 1 - UseFool (Knowledge and manipulation of nature between usefulness and deception in the Arabo-Islamic tradition (9th-15th century))
Periodo di rendicontazione: 2022-12-01 al 2025-05-31
At the core of UseFool’s textual corpus are four technical handbooks on entertainment and illusion composed in Arabic between the 6th/12th and the 9th/15th century. The experts who made their living on the streets worked with inexpensive and easily available materials, their devices meant for a large and relatively quick fruition. Their knowledge looked at nature from a different angle, certainly not from a lower step. This core is combined with other complementary sources, such as the handbooks for the inspector of the market. The sources about entertainment and fraud share many interests with the more erudite scientific tradition, as observed also in parallel cultural contexts of the same period. All Arabic technical handbooks engaged with entertainment and fraud give ample space to the useful and occult properties of mineral, vegetal, and animal substances (manāfiʿ and ḫawāṣṣ). This strong presence shows how the roots of this genre go back to the early Abbasid period, when the Arabo-Islamic culture acquired the huge antique and late antique lore of natural properties. One of the most striking features of this technical literature is the deafening silence of theory, especially when compared to its erudite counterpart, as if it was of no concern to practitioners, i.e. the real interest lay in the technical know-how and its concrete results. The lack of a theoretical dimension has traditionally developed into a derogative argument to consider this knowledge a second-class lore, more superstitious than technical. UseFool aims to overturn this negative image, and aims to reconstruct the bodies of knowledge implicit in the technical procedures described in the sources.
Usefool’s methodology is interdisciplinary. It integrates the philological, linguistic, and historical analyses of written sources with the experimental replication of the material and sensory reality behind those texts. Moreover, the project’s methodology envisages a third step, i.e. re-enactment, that is the performative and audience-bound aspects of such procedures. The project seeks to reconstruct the technical notions (‘kernels of knowledge’), the material reality, and the performative component entailed in the sources by replicating procedures in the laboratory and re-enacting their stagecraft.
The methodological pillar of replication has produced a set of thematic replication experiences that span from a variety of pigments, dyes, and inks specifically prepared for various supports to the Meadiaeval approach to instant ice. The case of artificial substances clearly shows the heuristic gain from this integrated approach to the sources. The detection of a fraudulent imitation presumes a great familiarity with all the various procedures to prepare an artificial substance and needs to define a test to unmask each possible counterfeit. From the unique insight offered by its sources, UseFool attempts to define a ‘chemistry of the artificial’.
The Project has explored the possibility or re-enactment both in the interpretation of the textual sources and in the creation of original perfomative experiences meant to inquire into the cognitive element embedded in the premodern knowledge of nature and its exploitation. Replications and experimetns have been thoroughly documented with photographic and video material, and are made available in the Project website (www.usefool.eu) in its Instagram profile (usefool_erc_project), and in the data repository (AMSActa).
Laboratory experiences and replication exploring the material reality behind the text have opened up to a new dimension, in which the goal plays a central role and the definition of the chemical boundaries of possibilities sheds a completely new light on the sources on entertainment, deception, and natural properties. The attempt to reconstruct the cognitive dimension of the procedures informs the interpretation of the sources and the replication of the procedure, representing an important addition to the interpretative tools of premodern science.