Descrizione del progetto
Come gli antichi Greci riuscivano a gestire efficacemente i loro confini
Le organizzazioni federali (centrali) da sole, sia nell’antica Grecia che nella società moderna, non sono in grado di limitare o risolvere conflitti all’interno e all’esterno dei confini. Il progetto FeBo, finanziato dall’UE, pone l’accento su come gli stati federali greci abbiano affrontato le questioni relative ai confini interni ed esterni. Dimostrerà che gli stati federali hanno attuato attente politiche di gestione dei confini volte a preservare l’equilibrio di potere e la stabilità, piuttosto che una coesistenza pacifica. Dimostrerà inoltre che, per avere successo, queste strategie hanno dovuto prendere in considerazione reti economiche, etniche, culturali e religiose.
Obiettivo
"""Federation for Peace in Ancient Greece” is the title of a well-known article published by J.A.O. Larsen in 1944 (Classical Philology 39: 145-62). As the world was being ravaged by war, Larsen wondered about the potential of federalism as a means of conflict resolution. The subject of his study was federal organisations in a broad sense in ancient Greece, but the research clearly stemmed from a question that is today becoming increasingly topical: can federal organisations limit or even eliminate intra-federal war? The project ""FeBo: Federalism and Border Management in Greek Antiquity"" starts from the assumption that the question above, which continues to be asked by scholars, no longer makes sense. Despite romantic projections, federalisation processes do not guarantee peaceful coexistence, neither within the constituent federal organisations nor on their external borders. This is true for both ancient Greece and the contemporary world. As far as ancient Greece is concerned (and perhaps not only ancient Greece), the question should focus rather on borders: how did the Greek federal states deal with the problem of internal (intra-federal) as well as external borders? The aim of this project is to demonstrate that (a) Greek federal states implemented precise border management policies; (b) these policies did not aim at peaceful coexistence, but rather at maintaining a balance of power and stability; and (c) in order to be successful, these strategies had to take into account economic, ethnic, cultural and religious networks, i.e. there had to be a multi-level policy of border management. In order to prove these points, it will be necessary to adopt a holistic perspective that takes into account not only political borders, but also everyone and everything that crossed and animated these, giving rise in turn to economic/cultural/ethnic/religious networks or even communities of destiny, which were of crucial importance for the stability of a federal state. Politics was not enough. Much more was needed."
Campo scientifico
Programma(i)
- HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC) Main Programme
Argomento(i)
Meccanismo di finanziamento
ERC - Support for frontier research (ERC)Istituzione ospitante
38122 Trento
Italia