Project description
Smart computers as judges
Algorithms and AI are applied increasingly in courts and informal arenas, replacing judges and mediators. This development is called dispute resolution automation (DRA). The phenomenon of the "vanishing third party" is transforming the role of human third parties in dispute resolution, but its consequences have yet to be studied, conceptualised and theorised. The EU-funded DRA project will develop a new theory of access to justice (barriers), procedural justice (perceived fairness) and substantive justice (just outcomes) for DRA. The project will develop a normative framework for just DRA, conduct a comprehensive empirical study of DRA platform data, generate a typology for the design of just automated processes, devise model procedural rules for DRA in courts and develop novel DRA assessment methods.
Objective
Courts without judges? Informal processes without mediators? We are on the verge of a dramatic paradigm shift in our justice system from human to algorithmic dispute resolution. While most of us perceive the delivery of justice as a human task, courts and informal arenas worldwide are increasingly relying on online processes that employ algorithms in lieu of judges and mediators. Also, artificial intelligence is more commonly used to support and predict judicial outcomes. Together, these developments constitute dispute resolution automation (DRA). What is still a nascent phenomenon, accelerated by Covid-19, is certain to expand dramatically within and outside courts, as our backlogged justice system seeks to transform the inefficient resolution and adjudication of cases, and expand access to justice. Despite growth of DRA, our theories, concepts, and rules remain focused on the role of human third parties in reducing barriers to courts, generating perceptions of procedural fairness, and ensuring just outcomes. The implications of the vanishing third party on justice have yet to be recognized, studied, conceptualized, and theorized. This project will fill this gap by offering a new theory of access to justice (barriers), procedural justice (perceived fairness) and substantive justice (just outcomes) for DRA. To that end, I will (1) develop a normative framework for just DRA, (2) conduct a comprehensive empirical study of real data in four research sites in different countries (France, the Netherlands, the U.S. and Israel), lab experiments on DRA, and interviews with designers and users of DRA; (3) generate a typology for the design of just automated processes across settings, and devise model procedural rules for the adoption of DRA in courts, and (4) develop novel methods for the evaluation of DRA.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2021-COG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
31905 Haifa
Israel
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.