Skip to main content
Vai all'homepage della Commissione europea (si apre in una nuova finestra)
italiano italiano
CORDIS - Risultati della ricerca dell’UE
CORDIS

Ecological impacts of floating photovoltaics in lake ecosystems

Periodic Reporting for period 1 - ECLIPSE (Ecological impacts of floating photovoltaics in lake ecosystems)

Periodo di rendicontazione: 2022-09-01 al 2025-06-30

Climate change, driven by increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, is critically impacting biodiversity and ecosystems across the globe. The growing energy demand, coupled with the urgent need to mitigate climate change, is accelerating the renewable energy industry. A key challenge is to ensure that climate mitigation strategies do not trigger counterproductive impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems.
A recent advancement in the photovoltaics sector, known as floating photovoltaics (FPV), involves arrays of photovoltaic panels attached to a floating plastic structure and secured on the water body using a mooring system. FPV deployments are accelerating globally due to their increased efficiency (owing to lower operational temperatures) and land-saving benefits. Yet, FPVs might also have negative impacts on freshwater ecosystems that could counterbalance their ecological benefits, and a major issue associated with their deployment is the absence of empirical studies assessing their ecological consequences.
FPVs are likely to affect a wide range of ecological parameters in lakes, acting across levels of biological organization and making it challenging to predict the overall outcomes of these interacting effects. They strongly limit the arrival of light and photosynthetically active radiation, directly affecting phytoplanktonic primary production and modifying the thermal functioning and oxygenation of the water column. FPVs can also affect water mixing and gas exchange by altering the influence of winds and currents on the water’s surface. These abiotic modifications are likely to change the composition of plant and animal communities, with cascading effects on biotic interactions, food web architecture, ecosystem metabolism, and ultimately, whole-ecosystem greenhouse gas balances. We predict that FPV ecological effects will be context-dependent, varying across environmental conditions (e.g. lake trophic status) and industrial factors (e.g. FPV design).
The general objective of ECLIPSE is to provide a robust, innovative, and integrative assessment of the ecological effects of FPV on lakes. The specific objectives (SO) are: (SO1) Measure the in-situ ecological impacts of FPV installation on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning; (SO2) Experimentally quantify the context-dependency of these effects (SO3) Parametrize a model to predict the impacts of FPV on lakes under climate change scenarios and (SO4) Provide evidence-based guidelines for FPV deployment.
The work developed during this fellowship was developed under four working packages, each related to one Specific Objective (SO). The fellow conducted her research activities at the “Centre de Recherche sur la Biodiversité et l'Environnement”, Université de Toulouse under the supervision of Dr. Julien Cucherousset (CRBE, Research Director at CNRS) and co-supervision of Dr. Stéphanie Boulêtreau (CRBE), and Dr. Fanny Colas (LEHNA, Université de Lyon 1). The working package (WP) 1 concerned the in-situ monitoring of lakes with and without FPV before and after the FPV installation, providing the monitoring of FPV ecological effects under a BACI (Before-After Control-Impact) framework. Monitoring of the lakes started on September 2022 and by summer 2022 3 lakes were equipped with FPVs (average 49 ±% coverage), generating a database with one year of “before” data for the impacted lakes and 2 years of “after” data by the end of this fellowship. During the fellowship, the fellow participated in seasonal and annual monitoring campaigns to sample abiotic (temperature, light intensity, nutrients), biotic (phytoplankton, periphyton, zooplankton, fish) and ecosystem functioning (decomposition, GHGs, ecosystel metabolism) data in each of the monitored lakes. The results of this monitoring, so far unique in the monitoring of FPV ecological effects, have been statistically analyzed using linear mixed effect models (LMMs) to test interactions between the before-after periods and the control-impact treatments (BACI contrast). They have been presented at a stakeholder final restitution meeting conducted on June 19th, 2025. All tasks related to WP1 were completed. The WP2 involved a mesocosm experiment which was conducted from May to September 2023 at the Aquatic Metatron, an experimental platform located in Moulis, France (42°57'N 1°05'E, Richard et al., 2025). The experimental design combined four levels of FPV coverage (0%, 25%, 45%, 65%), reflecting the global range observed in FPV installations (mean 34.2% ± 22 SD Nobre et al., 2024), across two ecological contexts representing different ecosystem maturities, simulated via nutrient enrichment. Each combination was replicated four times, resulting in 32 mesocosms. Samples were processed and statistical analyses were conducted. All tasks of WP2 were achieved. Currently a manuscript presenting the results of this experiment is under revision by co-authors.WP3 was developed in partnership with Lancaster University. We successfully developed a 3d model (Delft-3D) to simulate the effects of floating photovoltaic (FPV) systems on water thermal properties, including temperature dynamics and stratification. The study was conducted using as a model site, a gravel pit lake (Figure 10) in the south of France (latitude: 43.22º N, longitude: 1.61º E). Although we have simulated climate change scenarios as predicted in WP3, during the meetings between the fellow, the co-advisors and the collaborators from Lancaster University new questions regarding the implications of FPV structural design to its ecological effects raisedand were considered timelier and more relevant. As a result, we expanded the scope and focus of the modelling effort to investigate the ecological implications of different FPV array layouts. Specifically, we introduced the concept of “light islands”, open spaces within the FPV arrays, recognizing that light availability and wind exposure are likely key drivers of FPV-induced changes in water physics and cascading biological responses. The model was developed, calibrated and validated. Scenarios for light islands were developed and tested. The model has been fully developed, calibrated, and validated. We generated and tested multiple scenarios incorporating light island configurations. Currently, in collaboration with Lancaster University, we are conducting statistical analyses to evaluate the ecological effects of these different layouts. A manuscript detailing model development and calibration and one manuscript with the results of the light islands effects are currently in preparation. As far as we know, this is the first time this concept (“light islands”) is introduced and may help guide technical choices related to FPV design.
The main scientific Results and Impacts of the ECLIPSE project are published and reflected in its six scientific publications. The project has significantly advanced the state of the art regarding the potential ecological effects of FPVs systems on freshwater ecosystems. It also provided a comprehensive global overview of surface coverage of operational FPV installations. One of the most innovative aspects of the project is the generation of a robust empirical dataset based on multi-year, whole-lake monitoring conducted before and after FPV installation, an approach rarely used in this field. In addition, ECLIPSE carried out experimental and model studies examining the ecological effects of FPVs under varying environmental and technical conditions, offering new insights into how different FPV coverage intensities and deployment under different environmental contexts influence ecological outcomes. These advances contribute essential empirical evidence to guide future research, environmental assessments, and sustainable FPV implementation.
Reading GHG concentrations at the field
Sampling organisms for stable isotope analysis
Experimental platform
Zooplankton sampling
Il mio fascicolo 0 0