Project description
Educational choices for better outcomes
Many educational systems offer a variety of choices, but making the right decision can be challenging for both students and parents. Personal preferences and societal needs frequently do not align, which can affect the overall quality of education. Factors such as peer influence and behavioural biases can make it difficult for individuals to choose the best option. As a result, educational choices are often restricted by policies that limit access to certain programmes. The ERC-funded EDDYNCHOICE project will develop models to better understand how educational choices impact society. The project analyses school competition, tracking in secondary education, and college admissions using detailed data. The ultimate goal is to help policymakers find a balance between personal choice, ability, and diversity in education.
Objective
The diversity of educational opportunities has the potential to improve the situation of everyone by providing an environment, adapted to the needs and goals of all. Letting parents or students choose their trajectory can improve welfare as it allows them to sort into the right program, using their private information on comparative advantages and preferences. However, personal choices are not necessarily in line with society’s objectives because of externalities. Apart from financial externalities that are inevitable in subsidized educational systems, peer effects are crucial in this context as the student composition of an educational program affects its quality. Furthermore, from an individual perspective, the right choice is difficult to make, and behavioral biases (or “internalities”) are common.
As a result, such choices are often restricted. Targeted vouchers open up spots for some groups of children at the cost of others, grading standards prevent students from attending certain tracks or courses in high school, and college admissions prevent completely free access. However, there is little guidance for policymakers in knowing and realizing the optimal size and composition of different options. What is the right balance between choice, ability and diversity requirements in school choice and tracking? Are seats in college programs optimally provided according to society’s needs? How to incentivize students to align their choices with a societal optimum?
This project aims to develop a methodology to empirically analyze the optimal provision of choice using novel dynamic discrete choice models that take into account externalities and internalities. The objective is to apply this methodology to rich micro-data from the three main levels of education: school competition in primary education, tracking in secondary education, and admission and graduation in college.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2024-STG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
31080 Toulouse
France
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.