Project description
Choice architecture to understand sentencing decisions
The act of sentencing marks an important moment when the state’s power to punish intersects with an individual’s personal freedoms. This process is shaped by a complex set of decision-making dynamics that remain largely unexplored. The ERC-funded Sentrix project aims to enhance our understanding of sentencing decisions through choice architecture. It will develop a comprehensive framework that captures the multi-dimensional ‘sentencing environment’, focusing on elements such as judicial discretion and procedural nuances. Rather than simply distinguishing between legal and non-legal factors, the project emphasises the mechanics of sentencing by using a meta-analysis of existing literature, workshops, courtroom observations, and interviews. This initiative seeks to influence legal and policy reforms to improve the fairness of the justice system.
Objective
"The act of sentencing represents a critical juncture at which the power of the state to punish intersects with the personal freedoms of the individual. It is governed by an intricate set of decision-making dynamics, for which we lack a cohesive understanding. This ground-breaking project seeks to fill this gap by introducing a fresh perspective rooted in choice architecture, aiming to devise a comprehensive theoretical matrix that systematically captures the multi-dimensional nature of sentencing decisions.
Employing the notion of the decision-making environment, the project seeks to map out the ""sentencing environment"" – a concept that includes both well-researched elements like judicial discretion and less examined factors such as procedural nuances and habitual decisions. The objective is to move beyond the dichotomy of legal vs. non-legal factors, using choice architecture in a non-traditional way: not to guide decisions but to understand the sentencing landscape and its mechanics.
The methodology encompasses a metanalysis of existing literature supplemented by workshops, and testing the initial findings through courtroom observation, interviews, and experiments with practitioners to develop a typology of sentencing frameworks. These will be tested against real-world practices and subjected to computer simulations using agent-based modeling, providing a visual representation of the sentencing environment.
The project is pioneering for several reasons. Firstly, it unites fragmented research into a holistic picture, employing an interdisciplinary approach that promises greater transparency in sentencing. Secondly, it uses visualization and simulation as tools for communication and strategic reform, potentially influencing legal and policy directions. Lastly, it offers insights into how various sentencing dimensions interact with human decision-making, contributing to a fairer justice system and a deeper understanding of legal behaviour."
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
This project has not yet been classified with EuroSciVoc.
Be the first one to suggest relevant scientific fields and help us improve our classification service
You need to log in or register to use this function
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
HORIZON.1.1 - European Research Council (ERC)
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
HORIZON-ERC - HORIZON ERC Grants
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) ERC-2024-STG
See all projects funded under this callHost institution
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
1000 Ljubljana
Slovenia
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.