Project description
Human creativity vs machine translation for literary texts
Thanks to the latest achievements of AI and neural machine translation (MT) technologies, machine support in translation is used every day in many fields of work and life. Today, MT can increase productivity in technical texts translated by humans without affecting the final quality of the product given certain conditions. However, it is commonly held that MT cannot compete with human translation of literary or more creative texts precisely because of the machine lack of creativity. The EU-funded CREAMT project will develop a fellowship that will enable research on translation creativity and the reception by readers considering the translation of literary texts in three modalities: MT, human translation and human post-editing of MT.
Objective
Artificial Intelligence and Neural Machine Translation (MT) are at the forefront of the technology advances and are becoming ubiquitous in society. As automation increases, creativity is continuously referred as the characteristic that will differentiate us from machines. However, there is a need to understand what is meant by creativity in different contexts, and how technology impacts society in this regard. Focusing on the textual elements that determine creativity in translated literary texts and the reader experience, CREAMT uses a novel, interdisciplinary approach to assess how effective MT is in literary translation considering the ultimate user: the reader.
Research has shed some light on the usability of MT in literary texts showing that it might help translators, when it comes to productivity. However, translators’ perception is that the “more creative” the literary text, the less useful MT is. But can we quantify the creativity in texts translated by humans as opposed to those produced with the aid of machines? And what is the reader’s experience when faced with machine-translated texts? Do users exposed to different translation modalities have different reading experiences?
With this fellowship, I will analyse the creative aspect of literary texts translated using three modalities: MT, human translation and MT post-editing. CREAMT will quantify the reader’s experience using methodologies from Psychology, Communication and Literary Studies.
This fellowship will take place in the Computational Linguistics group in the Faculty of Arts at University of Groningen under the supervision of Dr. Antonio Toral who is leading the research on MT applied to literary texts. I have also planned a one-month secondment at the Film, Media and Visual Studies at University of Augsburg with the supervision of Prof. Helena Bilandzic who is an expert in the field of narrative experience and persuasion focusing mostly on entertainment narratives.
Fields of science (EuroSciVoc)
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
CORDIS classifies projects with EuroSciVoc, a multilingual taxonomy of fields of science, through a semi-automatic process based on NLP techniques. See: The European Science Vocabulary.
- natural sciences computer and information sciences artificial intelligence
- humanities languages and literature linguistics
- humanities arts
- humanities languages and literature literature studies literary theory literary criticism
- social sciences psychology
You need to log in or register to use this function
We are sorry... an unexpected error occurred during execution.
You need to be authenticated. Your session might have expired.
Thank you for your feedback. You will soon receive an email to confirm the submission. If you have selected to be notified about the reporting status, you will also be contacted when the reporting status will change.
Keywords
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Project’s keywords as indicated by the project coordinator. Not to be confused with the EuroSciVoc taxonomy (Fields of science)
Programme(s)
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
Multi-annual funding programmes that define the EU’s priorities for research and innovation.
-
H2020-EU.1.3. - EXCELLENT SCIENCE - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
MAIN PROGRAMME
See all projects funded under this programme -
H2020-EU.1.3.2. - Nurturing excellence by means of cross-border and cross-sector mobility
See all projects funded under this programme
Topic(s)
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Calls for proposals are divided into topics. A topic defines a specific subject or area for which applicants can submit proposals. The description of a topic comprises its specific scope and the expected impact of the funded project.
Funding Scheme
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
Funding scheme (or “Type of Action”) inside a programme with common features. It specifies: the scope of what is funded; the reimbursement rate; specific evaluation criteria to qualify for funding; and the use of simplified forms of costs like lump sums.
MSCA-IF - Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowships (IF)
See all projects funded under this funding scheme
Call for proposal
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
Procedure for inviting applicants to submit project proposals, with the aim of receiving EU funding.
(opens in new window) H2020-MSCA-IF-2019
See all projects funded under this callCoordinator
Net EU financial contribution. The sum of money that the participant receives, deducted by the EU contribution to its linked third party. It considers the distribution of the EU financial contribution between direct beneficiaries of the project and other types of participants, like third-party participants.
9712CP Groningen
Netherlands
The total costs incurred by this organisation to participate in the project, including direct and indirect costs. This amount is a subset of the overall project budget.