ADAMAS and STANDARDISATION BODIES. ADAMAS members monitored and contributed to the emergent standardisation bodies in both US and Europe (IEEE 802.16a and ETSI/BRAN HIPERMAN).
In June 2000, INTRACOM and RUNCOM promoted the establishment of a new Working Group (WG) in Europe that targeted to study the functional requirements of the F-BWA systems below 11 GHz. This WG was the preparatory phase of the HIPERMAN standardisation body that emerged some months later. Towards this direction, both companies contributed and a subset of contributions´ list is given below:
- A. Andritsou, P. Dallas, BRAN22-HMd082: Contribution to Functional Requirements for HIPERMAN, ETSI/BRAN#22, 27-30 Jan. 2001.
- RUNCOM, BRAN29d072r1, OFDM sub-channelization proposal, ETSI/BRAN HIPERMAN, Sophia Antipolis, France, 2-5 July 2002.
- RUNCOM, BRAN30d119, OFDM versus OFDMA comparison - comments, ETSI/BRAN HIPERMAN, Sophia Antipolis, 1-4 Oct. 2002.
Additionally to that, INTRACOM and OTE were among the leaders for the creation of a new Working Item (W.I) to study the feasibility and sharing issues of license exempt F-BWA in 5 GHz,band C (5.725-5.875 MHz). This W.I. is still in progress and the final decision for the creation will be made within 2004.
ADAMAS partners expanded the contribution activities also in US. A subset of the contributions is given below.
- Kitrozer et al, Frame Duration for 802.16a, C802.16a-02/65, IEEE802.16a, Session#19, 20-24 May 2002, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
- Nico Van Waes (NOKIA), I. Kitrozer (RUNCOM), Editorial rewrite of P802.16a/D4, C802.16a-02/67, IEEE802.16a, Session#20, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, 8-12 July 2002.
CONCLUSIONS
Hence, ADAMAS project had a great impact on the standardisation bodies and participated actively in all the decisions of both sides of the Atlantic. The result of this effort is that many of the ADAMAS internal contributions have adopted by the standards and therefore, ADAMAS is very similar to the relative standards.